Institutional Owners May Ignore Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's (NASDAQ:SBCF) Recent US$94m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's (NASDAQ:SBCF) Recent US$94m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构在佛罗里达海岸银行公司的大量持股意味着他们对该公司的股价具有重大影响力
- 共有10位投资者持有该公司的大部分股份,占有52%的所有权。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
Every investor in Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (NASDAQ:SBCF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位海岸银行公司(纳斯达克股票代码:SBCF)的投资者都应该注意最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构占据了该公司84%的所有权。换句话说,该群体将从对该公司的投资中获得最多(或失去最多)
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$94m last week. However, the 23% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
上周道富银行的市值下降了9400万美元,机构投资者遭受了最大损失。然而,股东们获得了23%的一年回报,可能已经缓解了打击。但他们可能会对未来的损失感到担忧。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点放在佛罗里达州海岸银行公司的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida?
机构持股告诉我们海岸银行公司的一些情况?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到海岸银行公司确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的一大部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但光凭这个事实是不够的,因为机构有时会做出不好的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总会存在它们会参与“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会争相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险会更高。您可以在下面查看海岸银行公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更加复杂的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。佛罗里达西海岸银行股份有限公司并不被对冲基金持有。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是添富基金集团有限公司,持有14%的股份。第二大股东是黑石集团,持有7.4%的普通股,而道富全球货币投资公司持有该公司5.0%的股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前10大股东持有超过半数股份,有一些较小的股东以一定程度上平衡更大股东的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
佛罗里达西海岸银行股份有限公司内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$34m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股东们可能会感兴趣地知道,Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida的内部持有股份。 内部人士拥有价值3400万美元的股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。如果您想了解内部人员的利益保持问题,可以 点击这里 查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众(包括零售投资者)拥有公司的14%股份,因此在公司政策不与大股东同步时,这个股份的大小虽然相当可观,但可能不足以改变整个公司的决策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。请注意,佛罗里达海岸银行公司在我们的投资分析中显示了2个警告信号,您应该知道...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。