CALB Group Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:3931) Market Cap Surged HK$2.7b Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
CALB Group Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:3931) Market Cap Surged HK$2.7b Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over CALB Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Institutional ownership in CALB Group is 18%
- 私人企业对CALb集团的重要控制意味着普通公众有更多影响管理和治理决策的权力
- 该公司的前五大股东拥有51%的股份。
- CALb集团的机构持有比例为18%
Every investor in CALB Group Co., Ltd. (HKG:3931) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
CALb集团有限公司(HKG:3931)的每位投资者都应注意最强大的股东群体。 拥有最大股份的是拥有47%所有权的私人企业群体。 换句话说,如果股价上涨(或出现下跌),该群体将获益最多(或损失最大)。
As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 13% gain.
因此,私人公司成为上周13%涨幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CALB Group.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了CALb集团不同所有权群体的细节。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CALB Group?
机构持股告诉我们有关CALb集团的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CALB Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CALB Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所见,机构投资者在CALb集团拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但是,在依赖机构投资者的所谓验证时最好保持警惕。他们也会有时出错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总会存在它们涉及的风险。当这种交易出错时,多个方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下方看到CALb集团的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CALB Group. Jiangsu Jintan Investment Group Co., Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 26% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.0% by the third-largest shareholder.
我们注意到对CALb集团没有意义的对冲基金投资。江苏金坛投资集团有限公司目前是最大的股东,持有流通股的26%。为了更好理解,第二大股东持有约8.5%的流通股,紧随其后的第三大股东持有8.0%的股权。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前5位股东控制了该公司超过一半的股份,这意味着该组人对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of CALB Group
CALb集团的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that CALB Group Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own HK$14m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们的信息显示,CALb集团有限公司的内部人员拥有公司不到1%的股份。但我们注意到,内部人士可能通过私人公司或其他公司结构间接持有利益。这是一家大公司,所以即使是很小比例的利益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在这种情况下,内部人员拥有价值1400万港元的股份。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但也值得查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in CALB Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通投资者,通常是个人投资者,持有CALb集团32%的股份。尽管这个群体不能直接决定事情,但他们确实可以对公司的运作产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 47%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们可以看到私人公司对双良节能系统股份有限公司的发行股份持有47%。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而非作为个人的容量而拥有对公众公司的利益。虽然很难得出任何笼统的结论,但值得注意作为进一步研究的一个领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CALB Group better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for CALB Group (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
考虑公司股份的不同持有团体总是值得的。但要更好地了解CALb Group,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了 CALb Group 的 2 个警示信号(有 1 个有点令人担忧!),在投资之前您应该注意这些。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。