share_log

Does The Market Have A Low Tolerance For MSA Safety Incorporated's (NYSE:MSA) Mixed Fundamentals?

Does The Market Have A Low Tolerance For MSA Safety Incorporated's (NYSE:MSA) Mixed Fundamentals?

市场是否对msa safety公司(纽交所:MSA)的基本面容忍度低?
Simply Wall St ·  09/30 10:42

It is hard to get excited after looking at MSA Safety's (NYSE:MSA) recent performance, when its stock has declined 4.2% over the past three months. It is possible that the markets have ignored the company's differing financials and decided to lean-in to the negative sentiment. Fundamentals usually dictate market outcomes so it makes sense to study the company's financials. Particularly, we will be paying attention to MSA Safety's ROE today.

看了MSA Safety(纽约证券交易所代码:MSA)最近的表现,很难感到兴奋,当时其股票在过去三个月中下跌了4.2%。市场可能忽视了该公司不同的财务状况,决定倾向于负面情绪。基本面通常决定市场结果,因此研究公司的财务状况是有意义的。特别是,我们今天将关注MSA Safety的投资回报率。

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.

股本回报率或投资回报率是股东需要考虑的重要因素,因为它可以告诉他们资本再投资的有效性。简而言之,投资回报率显示了每美元从其股东投资中产生的利润。

How Is ROE Calculated?

ROE 是如何计算的?

Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:

股本回报率可以使用以下公式计算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股本回报率 = 净利润(来自持续经营业务)÷ 股东权益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for MSA Safety is:

因此,根据上述公式,MSA安全的投资回报率为:

26% = US$272m ÷ US$1.0b (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

26% = 2.72亿美元 ÷ 10亿美元(基于截至2024年6月的过去十二个月)。

The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.26 in profit.

“回报” 是企业在过去一年中获得的收入。对此进行概念化的一种方法是,该公司每拥有1美元的股东资本,就能获得0.26美元的利润。

What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?

投资回报率与收益增长有什么关系?

We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features.

我们已经确定,投资回报率是衡量公司未来收益的有效盈利指标。现在,我们需要评估公司再投资或 “保留” 了多少利润以用于未来的增长,从而使我们对公司的增长潜力有所了解。假设其他条件都一样,与功能不相同的公司相比,具有更高股本回报率和更高利润保留率的公司通常具有更高的增长率。

MSA Safety's Earnings Growth And 26% ROE

MSA Safety的收益增长和26%的投资回报率

Firstly, we acknowledge that MSA Safety has a significantly high ROE. Secondly, even when compared to the industry average of 11% the company's ROE is quite impressive. For this reason, MSA Safety's five year net income decline of 2.2% raises the question as to why the high ROE didn't translate into earnings growth. So, there might be some other aspects that could explain this. Such as, the company pays out a huge portion of its earnings as dividends, or is faced with competitive pressures.

首先,我们承认MSA Safety的投资回报率非常高。其次,即使与行业平均水平的11%相比,该公司的投资回报率也相当可观。出于这个原因,MSA Safety的五年净收入下降了2.2%,这就提出了一个问题,即为什么高投资回报率没有转化为收益增长。因此,可能还有其他一些方面可以解释这一点。例如,该公司将其收益的很大一部分作为股息支付,或者面临竞争压力。

That being said, we compared MSA Safety's performance with the industry and were concerned when we found that while the company has shrunk its earnings, the industry has grown its earnings at a rate of 13% in the same 5-year period.

话虽如此,我们将MSA Safety的表现与该行业进行了比较,当我们发现尽管该公司缩减了收益,但该行业在5年同期的收益增长了13%时,我们对此感到担忧。

big
NYSE:MSA Past Earnings Growth September 30th 2024
纽约证券交易所:MSA 过去的收益增长 2024 年 9 月 30 日

The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. Doing so will help them establish if the stock's future looks promising or ominous. If you're wondering about MSA Safety's's valuation, check out this gauge of its price-to-earnings ratio, as compared to its industry.

为公司附加价值的基础在很大程度上与其收益增长息息相关。无论如何,投资者应设法确定预期的收益增长或下降是否已计入其中。这样做将帮助他们确定股票的未来是乐观还是不祥的。如果你想知道MSA Safety的估值,可以看看这个衡量其与行业相比的市盈率指标。

Is MSA Safety Efficiently Re-investing Its Profits?

MSA Safety 是否有效地将其利润再投资?

MSA Safety's very high three-year median payout ratio of 106% over the last three years suggests that the company is paying its shareholders more than what it is earning and this explains the company's shrinking earnings. Its usually very hard to sustain dividend payments that are higher than reported profits. Our risks dashboard should have the 2 risks we have identified for MSA Safety.

在过去三年中,MSA Safety的三年派息率中位数非常高,为106%,这表明该公司向股东支付的薪水超过了收入,这解释了该公司收益的萎缩。通常很难维持高于报告利润的股息支付。我们的风险仪表板应包含我们为MSA安全确定的两种风险。

Additionally, MSA Safety has paid dividends over a period of at least ten years, which means that the company's management is determined to pay dividends even if it means little to no earnings growth.

此外,MSA Safety已在至少十年内派发了股息,这意味着即使收益增长微乎其微,公司的管理层也决心支付股息。

Summary

摘要

On the whole, we feel that the performance shown by MSA Safety can be open to many interpretations. In spite of the high ROE, the company has failed to see growth in its earnings due to it paying out most of its profits as dividend, with almost nothing left to invest into its own business. Having said that, looking at current analyst estimates, we found that the company's earnings growth rate is expected to see a huge improvement. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.

总的来说,我们认为MSA Safety所表现出的表现可以有多种解释。尽管投资回报率很高,但该公司未能实现收益增长,因为它将大部分利润作为股息支付,几乎没有什么可以投资于自己的业务了。话虽如此,从分析师目前的估计来看,我们发现该公司的收益增长率预计将出现巨大改善。这些分析师的预期是基于对该行业的广泛预期,还是基于公司的基本面?点击此处进入我们分析师对公司的预测页面。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发