Veea Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VEEA) Stock Price Dropped 33% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy
Veea Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VEEA) Stock Price Dropped 33% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
关键见解
- Veea's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 49% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Insiders own 12% of Veea
- Veea拥有大量散户投资者的所有权表明,关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
- 49% 的业务由前三名股东持有
- 内部人士拥有Veea12%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Veea Inc. (NASDAQ:VEEA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制了Veea Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:VEEA),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,散户投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为51%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
As a result, retail investors as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$103m.
结果,在市值下降1.03亿美元之后,散户投资者作为一个整体承受了最大的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Veea, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究 Veea 的每种类型的所有者。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Veea?
关于Veea,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
交易不太活跃的小公司通常缺少机构投资者,但是没有机构投资者的大公司并不常见。
There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Veea, for yourself, below.
公司在股票登记处可能没有任何机构的原因有很多。如果流动性(每天交易的股票数量)低,机构可能很难购买大量股票。如果公司不需要筹集资金,机构可能缺乏建立立场的机会。或者,该公司的某些方面可能使机构投资者望而却步。机构投资者可能不认为该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能还有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面亲眼看到Veea过去的收入表现。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Veea. Our data shows that NLabs Inc. is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. Allen Salmasi is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Janice Smith holds about 0.2% of the company stock. Allen Salmasi, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
对冲基金在Veea的股票不多。我们的数据显示,nLabs Inc.是最大股东,已发行股份的38%。艾伦·萨尔马西是第二大股东,拥有12%的普通股,珍妮丝·史密斯持有公司约0.2%的股份。第二大股东艾伦·萨尔马西也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 3 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现有3名最大股东共同拥有的股份登记册不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Veea
Veea 的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Veea Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$214m, and insiders have US$25m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Veea Inc.合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为2.14亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值2500万美元的股票。很高兴看到内部人士对这项业务进行如此投资。可能值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Veea shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
公众主要由个人投资者组成,共持有Veea51%的股份。有了这么多的所有权,散户投资者可以在影响股东回报的决策中共同发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使权力,对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并进行投票。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股权所有权
With an ownership of 38%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股权公司拥有38%的所有权,可以在制定以价值创造为重点的公司战略方面发挥作用。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资并不多。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售资本并将其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Veea that you should be aware of before investing here.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了Veea的4个警告信号,在投资之前,您应该注意这些信号。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。