share_log

Institutional Investors Control 83% of Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 4.7%

Institutional Investors Control 83% of Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 4.7%

机构投资者控制Salesforce, Inc. (纽交所:CRM) 83%,上周股价上涨4.7%,他们获得了回报。
Simply Wall St ·  09/30 12:10

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Salesforce's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 23 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考虑到机构在股票中拥有大量股权,赛富时的股票价格可能受到它们交易决策的影响
  • 前23个股东拥有公司50%的股份。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制着Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM),重要的是了解企业的所有权结构。 我们可以看到机构拥有公司83%的所有权。 换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$12b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 36% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上周该公司市值增加了120亿美元,这对机构投资者来说是个好兆头。目前投资回报率为36%,上周的增长让人感到欢迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Salesforce.

在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注赛富时不同的所有权群体。

big
NYSE:CRM Ownership Breakdown September 30th 2024
纽交所:CRm 2024年9月30日的所有权分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Salesforce?

机构所有权对赛富时有何影响?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Salesforce does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Salesforce's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到赛富时确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的大部分股票。 这可能表明公司在投资社区中拥有一定的信誉度。 但是,最好对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持警惕。 他们有时也会犯错。 如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价快速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的赛富时收益历史记录。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:CRM Earnings and Revenue Growth September 30th 2024
纽交所:CRm 收益和营业收入增长2024年9月30日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Salesforce is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.0%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 5.7% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Marc Benioff directly holds 2.3% of the total shares outstanding.

机构投资者拥有超过公司50%的股份,因此他们共同可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。赛富时不是对冲基金持有。公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有9.0%的股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股东,持有7.8%的普通股,Capital Research and Management Company持有约5.7%的公司股份。此外,公司CEO Marc Benioff直接持有总流通股份的2.3%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 23 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更详细的所有权数据显示,前23大股东共拥有50%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东占多数。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Salesforce

赛富时内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Salesforce, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$7.1b. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股东可能会对于了解到赛富时有内部人持有股份感兴趣。内部人拥有价值71亿美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这显示了股东和董事会间良好的利益一致性。但仍值得查看这些内部人是否一直在卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

我认为查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但是为了获得真正的见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,风险 - Cadence银行有3个需要引起我们关注的警告信号。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发