share_log

With 75% Ownership, Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 75% Ownership, Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

拥有75%股权,Brady公司(纽交所:BRC)得到了强大的机构支持。
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 06:45

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Brady's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构拥有的股份比例显著高,这意味着布雷迪的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
  • 前10大股东持有50%的股份。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解布雷迪公司(纽交所:BRC)真正控制权的感觉,重要的是要了解企业的所有权结构。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司75%的股权。换句话说,这个集团从对公司的投资中获得(或者失去)最多。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Brady.

让我们仔细看一下,不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于布雷迪的一些信息。

big
NYSE:BRC Ownership Breakdown October 1st 2024
纽交所:BRC 2024年10月1日的所有权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brady?

机构持股告诉我们有关布雷迪的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Brady does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Brady, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到布雷迪确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的一大部分股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能单纯依赖这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某支股票,很可能会导致股价大幅下跌。因此值得检查布雷迪的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:BRC Earnings and Revenue Growth October 1st 2024
纽交所:BRC盈利和营业收入增长2024年10月1日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Brady. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Elizabeth Bruno, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

投资者应该注意,实际上,机构拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以共同行使重要影响力。对于Brady,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有股份的11%。为了更好理解,第二大股东持有约9.6%的股份,第三大股东持有9.4%的股份。第三大股东Elizabeth Bruno同时也是董事会成员。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前10大股东持有超过半数股份,有一些较小的股东以一定程度上平衡更大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Brady

Brady的内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Brady Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$357m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到,内部持有Brady Corporation的股份。 这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在有意义的一致性通常是积极的。 在这种情况下,他们持有价值约35700万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 大多数人会说这显示了股东和董事会之间的利益一致。 尽管如此,值得看看这些内部人员是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Brady. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通投资大众,通常是个人投资者,在Brady持有15%的股份。 虽然这一群体不一定能决定事情,但肯定会对公司的运行产生实质影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Brady you should be aware of.

我发现查看一家公司的所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察,我们也需要考虑其他信息。举个例子:我们发现了一处布雷迪的1个警告信号,你应该注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发