share_log

Is MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) Using Too Much Debt?

Is MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) Using Too Much Debt?

MasTec(纽交所:MTZ)是否使用了太多债务?
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 06:48

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, MasTec, Inc. (NYSE:MTZ) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:『波动性与风险并不等同。』因此显而易见,当您考虑任何特定股票的风险性时,您需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会拖垮一家公司。值得注意的是,MasTec公司(纽交所:MTZ)确实存在债务。但更重要的问题是:这笔债务带来了多大风险?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什么时候负债才是一个问题?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般来说,当公司无法通过筹集资本或利用自身现金流轻松偿还债务时,债务才会成为真正的问题。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能一无所获。然而,更频繁(但仍然成本高昂)的情况是,公司必须以极低的价格发行股份,永久性地稀释股东权益,以维护其资产负债表。当然,有很多公司使用债务来支持增长,而没有任何负面后果。在考虑公司的债务使用时,我们首先看现金和债务的总体情况。

What Is MasTec's Debt?

MasTec的债务是多少?

As you can see below, MasTec had US$2.27b of debt at June 2024, down from US$2.96b a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$297.6m in cash leading to net debt of about US$1.97b.

正如您所看到的,MasTec在2024年6月的债务为22.7亿美元,较一年前的29.6亿美元有所下降。另一方面,它有29760万美元的现金,净债务约为19.7亿美元。

big
NYSE:MTZ Debt to Equity History October 1st 2024
纽交所:MTZ负债股本比历史数据2024年10月1日

A Look At MasTec's Liabilities

MasTec的负债情况

According to the last reported balance sheet, MasTec had liabilities of US$2.75b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$3.20b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$297.6m and US$2.88b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$2.77b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

根据最近披露的资产负债表,MasTec在12个月内到期的负债为27.5亿美元,超过12个月到期的负债为32亿美元。与此同时,它手头有29760万美元的现金和28.8亿美元的一年内应收账款。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收款的组合多出27.7亿美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because MasTec is worth US$9.57b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

这种赤字并不严重,因为MasTec价值95.7亿美元,因此可能能够筹集足够的资本来支持其资产负债表,如果有需要的话。但我们绝对希望密切关注其债务是否带来过多风险。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了比较一个公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆盖率)。因此,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量以及支付的利率。

While MasTec has a quite reasonable net debt to EBITDA multiple of 2.4, its interest cover seems weak, at 1.1. The main reason for this is that it has such high depreciation and amortisation. While companies often boast that these charges are non-cash, most such businesses will therefore require ongoing investment (that is not expensed.) In any case, it's safe to say the company has meaningful debt. One way MasTec could vanquish its debt would be if it stops borrowing more but continues to grow EBIT at around 19%, as it did over the last year. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine MasTec's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

尽管MasTec的净债务/EBITDA倍数为2.4,但其利息保障倍数似乎较低,仅为1.1。主要原因是它有如此高的折旧和摊销费用。尽管公司常常吹嘘这些费用是非现金的,但大多数这类企业因此需要持续投资(这并没有支出)。无论如何,可以肯定该公司有实质性的债务。MasTec摆脱债务的一种方式是停止借款,但继续以大约19%的速度增长EBIT,就像去年那样。毫无疑问,我们大多数关于债务的了解都来自资产负债表。但最终确定MasTec能否保持健康资产负债表的能力,更多取决于未来收入。因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看这份显示分析师盈利预测的免费报告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, MasTec actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

但我们最后的考虑也很重要,因为一家公司无法用虚拟利润支付债务;它需要现金。因此值得查看EBIT中有多少是由自由现金流支撑的。在过去的三年中,MasTec实际上产生的自由现金流比EBIT多。在保持向贷款人良好的关系方面,没有什么比即将到账的现金更好的了。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, MasTec's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But we must concede we find its interest cover has the opposite effect. All these things considered, it appears that MasTec can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for MasTec you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

高高兴兴地说,MasTec出色地将EBIT转化为自由现金流,这意味着它在债务方面占据上风。但必须承认,我们发现其利息保障倍数产生了相反作用。综合考虑所有这些因素,看来MasTec可以轻松处理其当前的债务水平。当然,虽然这种杠杆可以增加股本回报,但也带来更多风险,因此值得密切关注。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表上了解到最多关于债务的信息。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表内,远非如此。举个例子:我们发现MasTec有3个警示信号,您应该注意,其中一个可能严重。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

说到底,有时候更容易集中精力关注根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费访问零净债务增长股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发