A Note On Aramark's (NYSE:ARMK) ROE and Debt To Equity
A Note On Aramark's (NYSE:ARMK) ROE and Debt To Equity
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine Aramark (NYSE:ARMK), by way of a worked example.
虽然一些投资者已经精通财务指标(致敬),本文是为了那些想了解净资产收益率(roe)以及其重要性的人。我们将使用roe来审视aramark(纽交所:armk),通过一个实例进行说明。
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.
ROE(净资产收益率)是股东需考虑的一个重要因素,因为它告诉他们资本被有效地再投资的效果如何。换句话说,它揭示了公司将股东的投资转化为利润的成功程度。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
怎样计算ROE?
Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:
股东权益报酬率可以使用以下公式计算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
净资产收益率 = 净利润(从持续经营中获得)÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Aramark is:
因此,根据上述公式,Aramark的ROE为:
16% = US$474m ÷ US$3.0b (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
16% = 4.74亿美元 ÷ 30亿美元(基于截至2024年6月的过去十二个月)。
The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.16 in profit.
“回报”是指公司在过去一年中的收益。这意味着对于每1美元的股东权益,公司产生了0.16美元的利润。
Does Aramark Have A Good ROE?
Aramark的ROE好吗?
Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Aramark has a similar ROE to the average in the Hospitality industry classification (16%).
可以说,评估公司的roe最简单的方法是将其与行业平均水平进行比较。这种方法的局限性在于,一些公司与其他公司相比有很大差异,即使在同一行业分类内。如果您查看下面的图片,您会发现aramark的roe与餐饮行业分类的平均水平(16%)相似。
So while the ROE is not exceptional, at least its acceptable. While at least the ROE is not lower than the industry, its still worth checking what role the company's debt plays as high debt levels relative to equity may also make the ROE appear high. If a company takes on too much debt, it is at higher risk of defaulting on interest payments.
因此,尽管ROE并不出色,但至少是可接受的。至少ROE并未低于行业水平,但仍值得查看公司债务所起的作用,因为相对于股权,较高的债务水平可能也会使ROE看起来很高。如果一家公司承担了过多的债务,就更容易面临利息支付违约的风险。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
为什么在观察ROE时你应该考虑债务问题?
Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
公司通常需要投入资金来增加利润。这笔资金可以来自留存收益、发行新股(资产)或债务。在前两种选择的情况下,roe将反映这种用于增长的资金。而在后一种情况下,用于增长的债务将提高回报,但不会影响总资产。这将使roe看起来比不使用债务时更好。
Combining Aramark's Debt And Its 16% Return On Equity
结合Aramark公司的债务和16%的净资产收益率
Aramark does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 2.01. There's no doubt its ROE is decent, but the very high debt the company carries is not too exciting to see. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.
Aramark确实使用大量债务来增加回报。它的债务与净资产比率为2.01。毫无疑问,它的净资产收益率是可观的,但公司承担的高债务并不令人兴奋。债务确实带来额外的风险,因此只有在公司能够从中获得一些可观回报时才真正值得。
Conclusion
结论
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
对于比较不同业务质量的公司,ROE很有用。在我们的书中,最高质量的公司具有高ROE,尽管其债务较低。如果两家公司的债务与股本比例大致相同,并且其中一家公司的ROE更高,我通常更喜欢ROE更高的那家公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是如果企业质量高,市场经常会将其出价至反映这一点的价格。还必须考虑利润增长的预期相对于当前价格中反映的利润增长预期的速度。因此,您可能会想要查看这家公司丰富数据的交互式预测图表。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果您想查看另一家可能具有更好财务状况的公司 - 具有高股本回报率和低债务的公司,那么请不要错过这份有趣公司列表,该列表免费提供。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。