share_log

Focus Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002315) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Jinhua Shen, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 18% Last Week

Focus Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002315) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Jinhua Shen, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 18% Last Week

焦点科技股份有限公司(SZSE:002315)最看好的内部人士是CEO沈金华,他们的持股价值上周增长了18%
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 21:07

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Focus Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 3 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Focus Technology is 20%
  • 内部人员似乎对焦点科技的增长有浓厚兴趣,这可从他们持有的股份大致看出
  • 前三大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
  • 焦点科技的机构持股比例为20%

Every investor in Focus Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002315) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Focus Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002315)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,个别内部人员拥有公司51%的所有权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将获益最多(或者在出现下行时损失最多)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥1.4b last week.

显然,上周建安满堃科技公司市值增加14亿元后,内部人士获益最多。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Focus Technology.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于焦点科技的信息。

big
SZSE:002315 Ownership Breakdown October 2nd 2024
深交所:002315公司股权结构于2024年10月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Focus Technology?

机构持股告诉我们有关焦点科技的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Focus Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Focus Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到焦点科技确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的一部分。这表明专业投资者中存在一定的信誉。但单凭这一事实是不足以依赖的,因为机构有时也会犯错误的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会存在它们涉足的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看焦点科技的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更多的。

big
SZSE:002315 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 2nd 2024
2024年10月2日SZSE:002315盈利和营业收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Focus Technology. The company's CEO Jinhua Shen is the largest shareholder with 46% of shares outstanding. With 3.1% and 1.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, National Council for Social Security Fund and E Fund Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

对焦点科技的对冲基金持有的股票不多。 公司的首席执行官沈晋华持有46%的股份。分别拥有3.1%和1.9%的流通股的社保基金会和易方达基金管理有限公司是第二和第三大股东。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Focus Technology

焦点科技的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Focus Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Insiders own CN¥4.9b worth of shares in the CN¥9.5b company. That's extraordinary! It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

最近的数据显示,焦点科技有限公司的大部分股权属于内部股东。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。内部股东持有价值49亿元人民币的股份,占到了这家价值95亿元人民币公司的绝大多数份额。这是非常了不起的!看到这种投资水平是很好的。您可以在这里查看这些内部股东是否已经卖掉了他们的股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大众,包括散户,拥有公司29%的股权,因此不能被轻易忽视。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面左右一个决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Focus Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Focus Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.

始终值得考虑公司中不同的股东群体。但要更好地理解焦点科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了一项针对焦点科技的警示标志,您在此投资之前应该意识到。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发