Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002381) Market Cap Rose CN¥412m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 48% Profited and so Did Insiders
Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002381) Market Cap Rose CN¥412m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 48% Profited and so Did Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 36% of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber is held by insiders
- 双箭股份的大量零售投资者持股表明关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响
- 前18大股东拥有该公司50%的所有权。
- 36%的双箭股份由内部持有
If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002381), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解谁真正控制着双箭股份股份有限公司(SZSE:002381),那么您将需要查看其股权注册情况。拥有最大份额的是拥有48%所有权的零售投资者群体。换句话说,该群体将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或蒙受最大损失)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 16% price gain, insiders also received a 36% cut.
尽管零售投资者是上周股价上涨16%后收益最多的群体,内部人员也获得了36%的份额。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了对浙江双箭橡胶的不同所有权群体的关注。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber?
机构持股告诉我们有关浙江双箭橡胶的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到浙江双箭橡胶确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司的股票的一大部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票,而且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能会犯错。如果有两家大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售某只股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此值得查看浙江双箭橡胶的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。
Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber is not owned by hedge funds. Gengliang Shen is currently the company's largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 5.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Huimin Shen is the owner of 4.0% of the company's shares.
浙江双箭橡胶不是由对冲基金所持有。申耿亮目前是公司最大的股东,持有21%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约5.5%和5.1%的股份。此外,CEO沈汇民拥有公司4.0%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东名册来看,我们可以看到18位最高股东控制了50%的股权,这意味着没有单个股东掌控股权的多数利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber
浙江双箭橡胶的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.1b stake in this CN¥3.0b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,内部人士在浙江双箭橡胶股份有限公司持有大量股份。内部人士在这家30亿元人民币的公司中持有11亿元的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击这里查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 48% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有48%股权,主要由个人投资者组成的大众,对浙江双箭橡胶有一定程度的影响力。虽然这个团体可能无法直接决定事务,但却可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.4%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有该公司8.4%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,所以值得进一步研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过独立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如:我们发现双箭股份存在2个警示信号,您应该注意其中一个有点令人担忧。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。