Palomar Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLMR) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 87% of the Company
Palomar Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLMR) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 87% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Palomar Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构在Palomar Holdings的大量持有权暗示着他们对公司股价有重大影响
- 企业前11大股东持有其51%的股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Palomar Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLMR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解真正掌控Palomar Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLMR)的人,重要的是了解该业务的所有权结构。 机构持有87%的股份,是该公司中持有最多股票的机构。 换句话说,这个群体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大利润(或者损失最大)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Palomar Holdings.
让我们仔细观察一下,看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关Palomar Holdings的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Palomar Holdings?
机构持股告诉我们有关Palomar Holdings的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Palomar Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Palomar Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Palomar Holdings在股东名册上已经有一些机构。实际上,他们在公司中持有可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一支股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查Palomar Holdings的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Palomar Holdings. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.0% and 5.1% of the stock. In addition, we found that D. Armstrong, the CEO has 1.9% of the shares allocated to their name.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此它们共同拥有相当大的权力。我们注意到,对Palomar Holdings没有意义的对冲基金。黑石集团目前是最大的股东,持有15%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.0%和5.1%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官D. Armstrong名下有1.9%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更详细地看一下我们的所有权数据显示,前11名股东拥有组合所有权的51%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Palomar Holdings
Palomar Holdings内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Palomar Holdings, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$61m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以报告,内部持有Palomar Holdings股份。这是一个相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的重要利益一般是积极的。在这种情况下,他们持有价值约6100万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 大多数人会说,这显示了股东与董事会之间的共同利益。不过,检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Palomar Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
占有10%股权的普通大众,主要由个人投资者组成,对Palomar Holdings有一定程度的影响力。 虽然拥有这样规模的股权相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不一致,可能还不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Palomar Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我发现查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得深刻见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,请考虑投资风险的长期存在。我们已经发现了与Palomar Holdings相关的2个警示信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程中的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。