Shenzhen Topband Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002139) 19% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 59% as Well as Insiders
Shenzhen Topband Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002139) 19% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 59% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
关键见解
- Shenzhen Topband's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 36% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 24% of Shenzhen Topband is held by insiders
- 深圳拓邦拥有大量个人投资者所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
- 36% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
- 深圳 Topband 24% 的股份由内部人士持有
A look at the shareholders of Shenzhen Topband Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002139) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看深圳拓邦股份有限公司(SZSE:002139)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有公司股份最多的集团是个人投资者,准确地说约为59%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥14b last week, while insiders who own 24% also benefitted.
上周市值触及140元人民币后,个人投资者涨幅最大,而持有24%的内部人士也从中受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen Topband.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于深圳Topband的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Topband?
关于深圳Topband,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Shenzhen Topband does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shenzhen Topband's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,深圳拓邦确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到深圳Topband的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen Topband. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Yongqiang Wu with 17% of shares outstanding. With 2.2% and 2.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Shuhai Ji and Renguo Xie are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对深圳Topband进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官吴永强,已发行股份的17%。季树海和谢仁国分别持有2.2%和2.0%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Topband
深圳拓邦的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shenzhen Topband Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥3.4b stake in this CN¥14b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有深圳拓邦有限公司合理比例的股份。有趣的是,内部人士在这项140元人民币的业务中拥有34元人民币的大量股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of Shenzhen Topband shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
公众主要由个人投资者组成,共持有深圳拓邦59%的股份。这种所有权水平赋予了广大公众的投资者一定的权力来影响董事会组成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等关键政策决策。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我一直喜欢查看收入增长的历史。您也可以,通过访问此详细图表中的这张免费的历史收入和收益图表。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。