Private Companies Among Wilmar International Limited's (SGX:F34) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.1% Last Week
Private Companies Among Wilmar International Limited's (SGX:F34) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.1% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Wilmar International indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 3 shareholders own 56% of the company
- Insiders have bought recently
- 私营公司在威廉国际拥有的大部分股权表明他们共同在管理和业务策略方面拥有更大的发言权
- 前三大股东拥有公司的56%。
- 内部人士最近购买了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Wilmar International Limited (SGX:F34), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制着威廉国际有限公司(新加坡交易所:F34),重要的是了解企业的所有权结构。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司42%的所有权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将获益最多(或者如果出现下行风险,损失也最多)。
As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit S$21b market cap following a 4.1% gain in the stock.
结果,私营公司上周取得最高分,因为该公司股价上涨4.1%,市值达到了210亿新元。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Wilmar International, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解各类威尔马国际股东,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wilmar International?
机构持股告诉我们有关威尔马国际的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Wilmar International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Wilmar International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,威尔马国际确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的相当一部分股票。 这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且喜欢它。 但与其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。 当多家机构持有一支股票时,总是有可能他们都在逐利交易。 当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能竞相快速抛售股票。 这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。 您可以在下面看到威尔马国际的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更多。
Wilmar International is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Kuok Group with 27% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 22% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.0% by the third-largest shareholder. Khoon Hong Kuok, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
威尔马国际并非由对冲基金持有。 查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是郭氏集团,持有27%的流通股。为了更好理解,第二大股东持有约22%的流通股,第三大股东持有7.0%的股份。 第三大股东郭近泉也恰好担任董事会主席。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 56% stake.
对股东登记簿的更详细研究向我们展示了三位最大的股东拥有56%的公司股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Wilmar International
威尔马国际的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Wilmar International Limited. Insiders own S$1.5b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有人在威马国际有一些股份。内部持有人持有价值15亿新元的股份(按当前价格计算)。我们有时会对他们是否一直在买入或卖出感兴趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Wilmar International. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在威马国际拥有21%的股份。虽然这种所有权比例可能不足以左右政策决策向他们青睐,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生共同影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 42%, of the Wilmar International stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
金联国际股份有限公司的42%股权似乎是由私人公司持有。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得深入了解谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过单独的私人公司持有公共公司股份。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 22% of the Wilmar International shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我们可以看到,公共公司持有金联国际22%的股份。虽然我们无法确定,但这很可能是一种策略性的持股。这些企业可能相似,或者合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Wilmar International has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.
我发现查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,冒险 - 金联国际有2个警告信号(其中1个有点不愉快),我们认为您应该了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。