Micron Technology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MU) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over the Past Week
Micron Technology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MU) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Micron Technology implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构在美光科技的大量持股意味着他们对该公司的股价有重大影响
- 23位最大股东持有General Mills公司50%的业务。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看美光科技股东,Inc.(纳斯达克:MU)可以告诉我们哪个集团最具影响力。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司81%的所有权。换句话说,该集团将从他们对该公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$111b in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 47% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周,机构投资者在公司市值达到1110亿美元后获益最多。投资回报率为47%,上周的盈利将更受欢迎。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Micron Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地了解美光科技每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Micron Technology?
机构所有权对Micron Technology能够告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Micron Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Micron Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在美光科技中持有相当大的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也有时会犯错。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,很容易看到股价大幅下跌。因此,检查一下美光科技过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Micron Technology. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.8% of shares outstanding. With 8.3% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能共同有力地影响董事会的决定。我们注意到对冲基金在美光科技中没有具有有意义的投资。现在,先锋集团是公司最大的股东之一,持有8.8%的股份。分别持有8.3%和5.2%的股份,黑石集团和卡普特研究与管理公司是第二和第三大股东。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
Sea股票内部持有情况 我们最新的数据表明,内部持有相当比例的Sea Limited的股份。内部人士持有价值65亿美元的这家价值430亿美元的公司。这是相当有意义的。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会正在与他们一起投资。您可能希望访问此处的免费图表,以显示内部人员的最近交易情况。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Micron Technology
Micron Technology的内部股权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Micron Technology, Inc.. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$268m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据显示,美光科技机构内部持有的股份不到1%。这是一家非常大的公司,所以预计内部人员持有的比例较小。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同拥有价值2.68亿美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一些内部持股总是好事,但值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Micron Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在美光科技持有19%的股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能还不足以左右政策决策偏好,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。