Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE:FNF) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 77% of the Company
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE:FNF) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 77% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Fidelity National Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 考虑到机构对股票持有的大部分股份,富达国民金融的股价可能会受到其交易决策的影响
- 企业前11大股东持有其51%的股份。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
Every investor in Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE:FNF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 77% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
富达国民金融股票的每位投资者都应该注意最强大的股东群体。拥有最大股份的群体是持有77%股权的机构。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fidelity National Financial, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解富达国民金融的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fidelity National Financial?
机构持股给我们关于富达国民金融的信息是什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Fidelity National Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Fidelity National Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,富达国民金融确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股份的很大一部分。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好谨慎地依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们也有时会判断错误。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查富达国民金融的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 6.0% of Fidelity National Financial shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.8% of common stock, and The WindAcre Partnership LLC holds about 6.0% of the company stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。看来富达国民金融的6.0%股份由对冲基金控制。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可能会非常活跃和积极。许多机构在寻找中期催化剂,以推动股价上涨。我们的数据显示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股东,持有14%的流通股份。第二大股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.拥有9.8%的普通股,而The WindAcre Partnership LLC持有约6.0%的公司股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的了解,我们发现前11名在该公司拥有51%的所有权,表明没有单一的股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Fidelity National Financial
富达国民金融的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Fidelity National Financial, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$823m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人士持有富达国民金融股份。内部人士持有价值82300万美元的股权。大多数人会说,这显示股东和董事会利益高度一致。但是,值得检查一下那些内部人员是否一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Fidelity National Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在富达国民金融持有12%的股份。虽然这一持股比例相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Fidelity National Financial that you should be aware of before investing here.
我发现看看公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了富达国民金融的1个警示标志,您在进行投资前应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。