With 83% Ownership, BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 83% Ownership, BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies BlackRock's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构持股比例显著高意味着贝莱德的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 总共有16家投资者拥有该公司的大部分股权,占50%的所有权。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
A look at the shareholders of BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下贝莱德股份有限公司(纽交所:BLK)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个团体最有权势。以83%的股权,机构拥有该公司中的最大股份。换句话说,该团体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of BlackRock, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解BlackRock的每种股东类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BlackRock?
机构所有权告诉我们有关贝莱德的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
BlackRock already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see BlackRock's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
BlackRock已经有机构持有股份。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。 这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定程度的信誉。 但是,最好谨慎依赖于机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会出错。 当多家机构持有某股时,总会存在一种“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下方看到BlackRock的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更复杂的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in BlackRock. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.2% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投资者应注意,机构实际拥有公司超过一半,因此他们可以集体行使重要权力。我们注意到对冲基金在贝莱德没有具有重大投资。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有8.9%的流通股。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的6.2%和5.4%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我们的所有权数字显示,前16名股东的所有权总计占50%,这意味着没有单一股东占有多数。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of BlackRock
贝莱德的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of BlackRock, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$1.2b of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司的内部人员以自己的名义拥有不到1%的股份。 由于公司规模如此之大,我们不会指望内部人员拥有大量股票。 他们总共拥有12亿美元的股票。 在这种情况下,看看那些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出股票可能更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in BlackRock. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,在贝莱德持有11%的股份。 尽管这个群体不一定能左右公司的决策,但确实可以对公司的运行产生实质影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。