Arta TechFin Corporation Limited's (HKG:279) Market Cap Increased by HK$479m, Insiders Receive a 73% Cut
Arta TechFin Corporation Limited's (HKG:279) Market Cap Increased by HK$479m, Insiders Receive a 73% Cut
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Arta TechFin implies vested interests in company growth
- 73% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Chi-Kong Cheng)
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 对裕承科金存在重要内部控制意味着对公司增长有着利益关系
- 公司73%的股份由单一股东(郑志刚)持有
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Arta TechFin Corporation Limited (HKG:279), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 73% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着裕承科金有限公司(HKG:279),那么您需要看看其股权登记的构成。 持有最大股份的是持股73%的个人内部人士。 也就是说,如果股价上涨,该团体将获得最大利益(或在股价下跌时损失最大)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$938m market cap following a 104% gain in the stock.
因此,内部人士上周得分最高,随着股票上涨104%,公司市值达到了HK$93800万。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Arta TechFin.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于裕承科金的什么。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arta TechFin?
机构持股缺乏给我们关于裕承科金的什么信息?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Arta TechFin might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
有多种解释为机构不持有某只股票。最常见的是公司相对于资产管理规模太小,因此机构不愿意仔细关注该公司。基金经理也可能不持有该股票,因为他们并不确信它会表现良好。裕承科金可能没有机构所期望的过去表现,或者也许他们只是没有深入研究该企业。
Arta TechFin is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Chi-Kong Cheng with 73% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second largest shareholder is Gain Bright Limited holding 5.9%.
裕承科金不受对冲基金持有。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是郑志刚,持有73%的流通股。这意味着他们对公司未来具有控制权。同时,第二大股东是Gain Bright Limited,持有5.9%。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。分析师观点也可以达到相同的目的。我们的信息表明,这只股票没有任何分析师覆盖,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of Arta TechFin
裕承科金的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Arta TechFin Corporation Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a HK$687m stake in this HK$938m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最新的数据显示,裕承科金有限公司的大部分股份由内部持有人拥有。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。因此,他们在这家价值9,3800万港元的公司中持有6,8700万港元的股份。看到这种投资水平是件好事。您可以在这里查看内部持有人最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Arta TechFin. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
占有21%的一般公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对裕承科金拥有一定影响力。尽管这个群体可能不能直接决定事务,但确实会对公司的运营产生实质影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 5.9%, of the Arta TechFin stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎私人公司拥有裕承科金5.9%的股份。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部持有人可能通过私人公司持股而非以个人名义对公共公司感兴趣。虽然很难得出任何明显结论,但值得注意作为未来研究的一个方向。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Arta TechFin you should be aware of, and 2 of them shouldn't be ignored.
虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如:我们发现裕承科金存在3个警示信号,您应该注意,其中有2个不容忽视。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。