share_log

The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTD) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 71% of the Company

The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTD) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 71% of the Company

the trade desk公司(纳斯达克:TTD)受到持有公司71%的机构投资者青睐
Simply Wall St ·  10/04 06:27

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Trade Desk's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鉴于机构在股票中持有大量股份,the trade desk的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响
  • 前13名股东占该公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTD) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下the trade desk, inc. (纳斯达克:TTD)的股东,就能知道哪个群体最有权势。 机构持有公司最多的股份,占有71%。 换句话说,这个群体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Trade Desk.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于the trade desk的信息。

big
NasdaqGM:TTD Ownership Breakdown October 4th 2024
NasdaqGM:TTD所有权分布2024年10月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trade Desk?

机构持股给我们关于Trade Desk的什么提示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Trade Desk. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trade Desk's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在the trade desk中占有相当大的份额。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这只股票,并且喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的the trade desk营业收入历史数据。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGM:TTD Earnings and Revenue Growth October 4th 2024
纳斯达克GM:TTD盈利和营收增长2024年10月4日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Trade Desk is not owned by hedge funds. With a 8.8% stake, CEO Jeffrey Green is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.6% and 7.5% of the stock.

由于机构投资者拥有超过半数已发行股票,董事会可能必须关注他们的偏好。交易桌不属于对冲基金所有。首席执行官杰弗里·格林持有8.8%的股份,是最大的股东。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.6%和7.5%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

通过股权调查,我们发现前13名股东在公司中拥有50%的股权,表明没有单一股东对该公司具有重大控制权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Trade Desk

Trade Desk的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in The Trade Desk, Inc.. Insiders own US$5.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到内部持有The Trade Desk, Inc.的股份。内部持有价值51亿美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到这种投资水平是件好事。您可以在这里检查看看这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Trade Desk. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有20%的股份,大众,主要由个人投资者组成,对the trade desk有一定影响力。虽然这个群体不能确定地决定一切,但肯定对公司的运行有着实质性的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Trade Desk .

我觉得看一家公司的股东是非常有趣的。但为了真正洞悉情况,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该注意到我们发现的与the trade desk有关的1个警示信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发