share_log

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 72%

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 72%

强生公司(NYSE:JNJ)受机构投资者青睐,他们拥有72%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  10/04 10:06

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Johnson & Johnson's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鉴于机构在股票中所占的大部分股权,强生(Johnson & Johnson)的股价可能会对它们的交易决策产生影响。
  • 共有25位投资者拥有该公司的大多数股份,占公司股份43%。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

A look at the shareholders of Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 72% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一下强生(Johnson & Johnson)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。机构持有公司72%的股份,拥有最多的股票。换句话说,如果股价上涨,该群体将从中受益最多(或在股价下跌时损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Johnson & Johnson.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了强生公司的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:JNJ Ownership Breakdown October 4th 2024
纽约证券交易所:强生公司所有权拆分,2024年10月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Johnson & Johnson?

机构持股告诉我们什么关于强生公司?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Johnson & Johnson. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Johnson & Johnson, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在强生公司拥有相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两位大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售某只股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得查看强生公司过去的盈利轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:JNJ Earnings and Revenue Growth October 4th 2024
纽交所:强生2024年10月4日的收益和营业收入增长

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Johnson & Johnson. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.5% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.2% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.5% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有该公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会决策。我们注意到,对强生公司没有什么有意义的投资。目前,先锋集团拥有公司最大的股份,占已发行股份的9.5%。黑石集团是第二大股东,拥有公共股的8.2%,而道富银行全球投资者持有该公司股份的约5.5%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Johnson & Johnson

强生公司的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our information suggests that Johnson & Johnson insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$294m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

根据我们的信息,强生公司内部人员拥有公司不到1%的股份。 由于公司规模庞大,我们不指望内部人员拥有大部分股票。 他们共持有2.94亿美元的股票。 最近的买卖行为可以说同样重要。 您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Johnson & Johnson. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有强生公司27%的股份。 虽然这个群体不一定能左右形势,但肯定能对公司的运行产生实质影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Johnson & Johnson , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我发现查看公司所有者身份非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险始终存在。我们已经发现了关于强生公司的一个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发