Jiangsu Pacific Quartz Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603688) Market Cap Rose CN¥1.5b Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 36% Profited and so Did Insiders
Jiangsu Pacific Quartz Co., Ltd's (SHSE:603688) Market Cap Rose CN¥1.5b Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 36% Profited and so Did Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Jiangsu Pacific Quartz indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 53% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Jiangsu Pacific Quartz is 32%
- 石英股份股东中个人投资者拥有相当大的股权,这意味着他们集体在管理和业务策略上拥有更大的发言权
- 前三大股东持有该公司53%的股份。
- 石英股份内部投资人持股比例为32%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Jiangsu Pacific Quartz Co., Ltd (SHSE:603688), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 36% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制石英股份有限公司(SHSE:603688),重要的是了解业务的所有权结构。拥有最大股份的是个人投资者,持股36%。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或者如果出现下跌),这个群体将获益最多(或者损失最多)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 10% price gain, insiders also received a 32% cut.
尽管在上周股价上涨10%之后,个人投资者获益最大,但内部人士也获得了32%的利润。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Jiangsu Pacific Quartz, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究每一种江苏太阳能石英所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jiangsu Pacific Quartz?
机构持有权告诉我们有关江苏太阳能石英的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Jiangsu Pacific Quartz already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Jiangsu Pacific Quartz's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
江苏太阳能石英已经有机构在股权登记册上。事实上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中享有一定程度的信誉。但最好警惕依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会搞错。如果多家机构同时改变对某只股票的观点,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看看江苏太阳能石英的下面收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jiangsu Pacific Quartz. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Shibin Chen with 27% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 23% and 3.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对石英股份,对冲基金持有的股份不多。查看我们的数据,CEO Shibin Chen拥有27%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的23%和3.1%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好礼。该股票受到的分析师覆盖范围很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空间获得更多的覆盖范围。
Insider Ownership Of Jiangsu Pacific Quartz
石英股份内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Jiangsu Pacific Quartz Co., Ltd. Insiders own CN¥5.1b worth of shares in the CN¥16b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
insiders 拥有江苏石英股份有限公司的大部分股份。 内部人员在市值160亿人民币的公司中拥有51亿人民币的股份。 这是相当有意义的。 很高兴看到这种投资水平。 您可以在这里查看内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公众——包括散户投资者——拥有该公司36%的股权,因此不能轻易忽视。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在政策决策方面左右,但他们仍然可以对公司的政策做出集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 23%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有公司23%的股份。光从这个事实本身很难得出任何结论,所以值得进一步研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过独立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Jiangsu Pacific Quartz has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我发现了解谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如冒险-石英股份有1个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。