RTX Corporation's (NYSE:RTX) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.8% Over Last Week
RTX Corporation's (NYSE:RTX) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.8% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, RTX's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 考虑到机构在股票中所持有的大部分股权,RTX的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
- 前13大股东持有该业务的51%。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of RTX Corporation (NYSE:RTX) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下RTX公司(纽交所:RTX)的股东,就能了解哪个群体更具影响力。持有最大股份的群体是拥有83%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获得最大利益(或者如果市场走低,则会承担最大风险)。
Last week's 3.8% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 84% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上周3.8%的增长意味着机构投资者处于正面的一端,即使公司展现出强劲的长期趋势。 股东的一年回报率目前为84%,上周的增长更是锦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about RTX.
让我们仔细看一下,看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关RTX的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RTX?
机构持有量对RTX有何影响?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that RTX does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RTX's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到RTX确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的相当一部分股票。 这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且喜欢它。 但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能错了。 当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在着它们进行'涌入式交易'的风险。 当这种交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。 在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。 您可以在下面看到RTX的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更复杂的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in RTX. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company with 12% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.7%.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能能够强烈影响董事会的决定。我们注意到对冲基金对RTX没有明显的投资。通过我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是Capital Research and Management Company拥有12%的股份。第二和第三大股东分别是The Vanguard Group,Inc.和State Street Global Advisors,Inc.,他们各自持有相等比例的股份为8.7%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据的进一步研究表明,前13大股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of RTX
RTX的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of RTX Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$154m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的数据显示,在RTX公司中,内部持有人以自己的名义持有不到1%的股份。 这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部持有公司的比例很大是令人惊讶的。 尽管他们持有的股份不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共持有价值15400万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 看到至少有一些内部所有权总是件好事,但值得注意的是这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RTX. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个体投资者,在RTX持有16%的股份。 尽管这一群体不能直接决定事情,但他们确实可以对公司的经营产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for RTX (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我觉得看一家公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经发现了有关RTX的4个警示迹象(其中一个有点令人担忧!),在投资之前您应该注意这些。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。