Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 85% of the Company
Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 85% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Comcast's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 22 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构持股高意味着康卡斯特的股价对它们的交易行为非常敏感
- 22个投资者持有该公司的51%所有权。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
If you want to know who really controls Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 85% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制着康卡斯特公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CMCSA),那么你需要查看其股东注册组成。持有该公司股份数量最多的是机构,确切地说,大约85%的股份归机构所有。换句话说,这个团体在投资该公司方面可能获得最多的利润(或者承担最大的风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Comcast.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注康卡斯特的不同所有权集团。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Comcast?
机构所有权对康卡斯特有何启示?可以看出康卡斯特确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的相当一部分股票。这表明公司在投资界中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好不要过分依赖机构投资者所谓的认可。他们有时也会犯错。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总会存在一种“拥挤交易”的风险。如果这样的交易失败了,多个方面可能会争相快速抛售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到康卡斯特的历史收入和营业收入,但要记住,故事总会更多。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Comcast does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Comcast, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到康卡斯特确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的大部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为有时机构投资者也会犯错,就像每个人都会一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,很常见会导致股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查康卡斯特的过往收益轨迹(以下)。当然,要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Comcast is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.6% of shares outstanding. With 8.3% and 6.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Brian Roberts directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会很可能需要关注他们的偏好。康卡斯特不是对冲基金持有。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是"梵蒂冈集团",拥有9.6%的股份。其次,"黑石集团"和"卡普尔研究与管理公司"分别拥有8.3%和6.4%的股份,是第二和第三大股东。此外,该公司的CEO布赖恩·罗伯茨直接持有总股份的0.9%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 22 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记册,我们可以看到前22名股东控制着51%的所有权,这意味着没有任何单一股东对所有权拥有绝对优势。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Comcast
康卡斯特的内幕所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Comcast Corporation. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$1.5b of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有康卡斯特公司股份不到1%。由于规模如此之大,我们不会指望内部持有大部分股票。他们共拥有15亿美元的股票。可以说最近的买卖行为同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Comcast. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,在康卡斯特持有14%的股份。虽然这一群体通常无法做出决定,但确实可能对公司的运行产生实质影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Comcast better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Comcast .
始终值得考虑不同的股东群体。但要更好地了解康卡斯特,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该注意我们发现的与康卡斯特有关的1个警示标志。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。