With 72% Ownership, DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 72% Ownership, DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DuPont de Nemours' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 鉴于机构在股票中所占比例较大,杜邦的股价可能受到它们交易决策的影响。
- 前25大股东持有47%的业务。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制着杜邦杜邦(NYSE:DD)的业务,了解业务的所有权结构至关重要。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司72%的股权,即该团体将在股价上涨时获益最多(或在股价出现下跌时损失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DuPont de Nemours.
让我们仔细看一下,看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于杜邦的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DuPont de Nemours?
机构持有权告诉我们关于杜邦德诺尔的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that DuPont de Nemours does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DuPont de Nemours' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到杜邦确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的一大部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。 但我们不能仅凭这个事实就下结论,因为机构有时会犯错误的投资,就像任何人一样。 当多家机构持有一支股票时,总会存在它们处于 '拥挤交易' 的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在一家没有增长历史的公司中更高。 你可以在下方看到杜邦的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更加丰富多彩。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. DuPont de Nemours is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
投资者应该注意,实际上有超过一半的股份被机构持有,因此他们可以共同行使重要的权力。杜邦德尼莫斯并不是对冲基金所拥有的。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,持有股份的比例为11%。第二大股东持有约7.0%的流通股,第三大股东持有4.7%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of DuPont de Nemours
杜邦德诺尔的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of DuPont de Nemours, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$67m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据显示,杜邦公司的内部持股不到1%。由于这是一家大公司,我们只希望内部持有很小的比例。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值6700万美元的股份。看到至少部分内部持股总是好事,但也值得注意这些内部持有人是否一直在减持。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in DuPont de Nemours. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般大众,通常是个人投资者,在杜邦公司持有27%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能左右决策,但确实可以对公司的运行产生实质影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for DuPont de Nemours that you should be aware of.
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定杜邦的3个警示信号,您应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。