LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Hasn't Managed To Accelerate Its Returns
LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Hasn't Managed To Accelerate Its Returns
If you're not sure where to start when looking for the next multi-bagger, there are a few key trends you should keep an eye out for. One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. Having said that, from a first glance at LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.
如果您不确定从哪里开始寻找下一个成倍增长的股票,有几个关键趋势是您应该留意的。一种常见的方法是尝试找到一个资本回报率(ROCE)不断增长的公司,同时资本投入也在增加。基本上,这意味着公司有盈利的倡议,可以持续进行再投资,这是一个复利机器的特征。话虽如此,就从对纳斯达克的LKQ(NASDAQ:LKQ)的第一眼看来,我们并没有因为回报的趋势而兴奋,但让我们深入了解一下。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我们对 Enphase Energy 的资本雇用回报率的看法:正如我们上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的资本回报率没有提高,但它正在重新投资于业务。投资者必须认为未来会有更好的前景,因为股票表现良好,使持股五年以上的股东获得了 690% 的收益。最终,如果基本趋势持续存在,我们不会对它成为一只多头股持有期很久很有信心。
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for LKQ:
对于那些不了解的人,ROCE是衡量公司每年税前利润(其回报)与业务中投入资本的相对关系的指标。 分析师使用此公式来计算LKQ:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。
0.11 = US$1.3b ÷ (US$15b - US$2.9b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.11 = 130亿美元 ÷ (150亿美元 - 29亿美元)(基于2024年6月的过去十二个月)。
Therefore, LKQ has an ROCE of 11%. By itself that's a normal return on capital and it's in line with the industry's average returns of 11%.
因此,LKQ的ROCE为11%。单独看来,这是一个正常的资本回报率,与行业平均回报率11%相符。
In the above chart we have measured LKQ's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for LKQ .
在上表中,我们测量了LKQ之前的ROCE与其之前的表现,但未来可能更重要。如果您感兴趣,可以查看分析师在我们免费的LKQ分析师报告中的预测。
The Trend Of ROCE
当寻找下一个倍增器时,如果您不确定从哪里开始,请关注几个关键趋势。首先,我们希望看到一个经过验证的资本使用率。如果您看到这一点,通常意味着这是一家拥有出色业务模式和大量盈利再投资机会的公司。然而,调查蒙托克可再生能源公司(NASDAQ:MNTK)后,我们认为它的现行趋势不符合倍增器的模式。
Things have been pretty stable at LKQ, with its capital employed and returns on that capital staying somewhat the same for the last five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at LKQ in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. With fewer investment opportunities, it makes sense that LKQ has been paying out a decent 32% of its earnings to shareholders. Given the business isn't reinvesting in itself, it makes sense to distribute a portion of earnings among shareholders.
在LKQ,资本运用和资本回报率在过去五年保持相对稳定。在观察到一个成熟稳定的企业时,看到这种情况并非罕见,因为该企业可能已经过了重投资收益的阶段。因此,除非在LKQ的ROCE和额外投资方面出现重大变化,否则我们不会对它成为大赢家抱有太大期待。由于投资机会较少,可以理解LKQ已经向股东支付了32%的盈利。鉴于该企业没有自我再投资,将一部分利润分配给股东是明智之举。
The Bottom Line On LKQ's ROCE
关于LKQ的ROCE的要点
We can conclude that in regards to LKQ's returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. And with the stock having returned a mere 36% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. As a result, if you're hunting for a multi-bagger, we think you'd have more luck elsewhere.
我们可以得出结论,在LKQ的资本运用回报率和趋势方面,并没有太多变化可报告。最近五年,该股票仅为股东提供了36%的回报,您可以说他们已经意识到这些乏喵的趋势。因此,如果您在寻找大赢家,我们认为您在其他地方更有可能获得好运。
One more thing, we've spotted 3 warning signs facing LKQ that you might find interesting.
另外,我们发现了面临LKQ的3个警告信号,您可能会感兴趣。
While LKQ isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
尽管LKQ的回报率不高,请查看这份免费的企业列表,这些企业在权益投资回报率方面表现优异,并拥有稳固的资产负债表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。