share_log

Public Companies Invested in ICL Group Ltd (NYSE:ICL) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$323m Market Cap Decline

Public Companies Invested in ICL Group Ltd (NYSE:ICL) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$323m Market Cap Decline

投资以色列化学有限公司(纽交所:ICL)的上市公司承受了上周3.23亿美元市值下降的冲击
Simply Wall St ·  10/09 07:27

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over ICL Group by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Institutions own 25% of ICL Group
  • 公共公司对以色列化学的重大控制意味着普通公众有更多影响管理和治理决策的权力
  • 共有2位投资者拥有该公司50%的所有权。
  • 机构拥有以色列化学25%的股份

A look at the shareholders of ICL Group Ltd (NYSE:ICL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 44% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看以色列化学有限公司(纽交所:ICL)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有实力。公共公司持有44%的股份,是该公司最大的股东。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And following last week's 5.9% decline in share price, public companies suffered the most losses.

在上周股价下跌5.9%后,公共公司遭受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ICL Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于以色列化学的什么。

big
NYSE:ICL Ownership Breakdown October 9th 2024
纽交所:以色列化学2024年10月9日的所有权拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ICL Group?

机构持股告诉我们关于以色列化学的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

ICL Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ICL Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

以色列化学已经有机构持有股份登记。事实上,他们在公司持有相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中享有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为有时机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会存在它们处于“拥挤交易”中的风险。当这样的交易失败时,多方可能竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以在下面看到以色列化学的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住事情总有更多层面。

big
NYSE:ICL Earnings and Revenue Growth October 9th 2024
纽交所:以色列化学第四季度收益和营业收入增长2024年10月9日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in ICL Group. Our data shows that Israel Corporation Ltd is the largest shareholder with 44% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

对冲基金在以色列化学集团中所持股份不多。我们的数据显示,以色列化学有限公司是最大的股东,持有44%的流通股。第二大股东持有约6.1%的流通股,其次是第三大股东持有3.4%的所有流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of ICL Group

以色列化学集团的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of ICL Group Ltd in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$5.6m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据显示,ICL Group Ltd的内部人员以自己的名义拥有不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大型公司,内部人员拥有价值560万美元的股份。绝对价值可能比比例份额更重要。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但值得注意的是这些内部人员是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ICL Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有31%股权的普通公众,主要是个人投资者,对ICL Group有一定程度上的影响。尽管拥有的股权相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 44% of ICL Group stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

目前,公共公司拥有以色列化学44%的股份。 这可能是出于战略利益考虑,这两家公司可能有相关的业务利益。 也可能是它们进行了拆分。 这个持股可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ICL Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for ICL Group you should be aware of.

思考公司股东的不同群体总是值得的。 但要更好地了解以色列化学,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 一个例子是:我们发现了2个应该注意的以色列化学2警示信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发