The Recent CN¥465m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603135)
The Recent CN¥465m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603135)
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) implies vested interests in company growth
- 60% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 中中科技(天津)的重要内部控制意味着对公司增长的既得利益
- 前2大股东持有业务的60%。
- 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603135), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制着中中科技(天津)股份有限公司(SHSE:603135),重要的是了解企业的所有权结构。我们可以看到,个别内部人拥有公司的绝大部分所有权,占据67%的所有权。换句话说,该团体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大利益(或承担最大风险)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 7.6%.
上周,股票下跌7.6%,内部人士遭受了最大的损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin).
下面的图表中,我们着眼于中中科技(天津)的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin)?
缺乏机构股东,对于中中科技(天津)有什么启示?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。
There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
公司可能没有任何机构在股东名册上的原因有很多。如果流动性(每天交易的股票数量)较低,机构可能难以购买大量股票。如果公司没有需要筹集资本,机构可能缺乏建立头寸的机会。另外,可能是公司的某些因素使机构投资者远离。 天津中中科技可能没有机构追寻的过去表现,或者也许他们只是没有仔细研究过这家企业的业务。
Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Bingbing Ma, with ownership of 48%. Fenglan Gu is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Guomao Reducer Group Co., Ltd. holds about 5.6% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Hongxin Wang is the owner of 2.4% of the company's shares.
中中科技(天津)不是对冲基金所有。该公司最大的股东是Bingbing Ma,持有48%的股份。第二大股东是冯岚顾,拥有12%的普通股,国冒减速器集团有限公司持有该公司5.6%的股份。此外,CEO王鸿鑫拥有公司股份的2.4%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但还是研究分析师的建议,以深入了解股票预期表现,是一个好习惯。就我们所知,该公司没有分析师覆盖,因此可能没有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin)
中中科技(天津)的内部人持股状况。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥5.6b, that means they have CN¥3.8b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部持有中中科技(天津)有限公司超过一半的股份。这使他们有效地控制了公司。鉴于其市值为56亿人民币,这意味着他们持有38亿人民币的股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望免费发现他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin). While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在中中科技(天津)持有20%的股份。虽然这个群体不能说了算,但肯定可以实际影响公司的运行方式。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 13%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们可以看到,私营公司拥有已发行股份的13%。私营公司可能是相关方。有时,内部人员通过私营公司持有公共公司的利益,并不是以个人身份持有。尽管很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是作为进一步研究的一个领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Zhongzhong Science & Technology (Tianjin) has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我发现查看公司的股东非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例 - 中中科技(天津)有2个警示标志,我们认为您应该注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。