MGM China Holdings Limited's (HKG:2282) Last Week's 8.5% Decline Must Have Disappointed Public Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
MGM China Holdings Limited's (HKG:2282) Last Week's 8.5% Decline Must Have Disappointed Public Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
关键见解
- MGM China Holdings' significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- MGM Resorts International owns 56% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 美高梅中国控股拥有大量上市公司所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
- 米高梅国际度假村拥有该公司56%的股份
- 分析师的预测以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有深刻的了解
A look at the shareholders of MGM China Holdings Limited (HKG:2282) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 56% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看美高梅中国控股有限公司(HKG: 2282)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有56%所有权的上市公司。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。
As a result, public companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by HK$4.0b.
结果,在市值下降40亿港元之后,上市公司整体上周遭受了最大的损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of MGM China Holdings.
在下图中,我们放大了米高梅中国控股的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MGM China Holdings?
关于美高梅中国控股,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MGM China Holdings. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MGM China Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所见,机构投资者持有米高梅中国控股的相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到美高梅中国控股的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in MGM China Holdings. Our data shows that MGM Resorts International is the largest shareholder with 56% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 10.0% of the stock. Chiu Ho, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Co-Chairman of the Board.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对米高梅中国控股进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,米高梅国际度假村是最大股东,已发行股份的56%。由于所有权持有如此巨额的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约12%和10.0%的股份。第三大股东Chiu Ho也恰好拥有董事会联席主席的头衔。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of MGM China Holdings
美高梅中国控股的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in MGM China Holdings Limited. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own HK$4.2b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有米高梅中国控股有限公司的股份。这是一家大公司,因此很高兴看到这种一致性。内部人士拥有价值42亿港元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in MGM China Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有米高梅中国控股13%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据表明,私营公司持有公司12%的股份。私人公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而不是以个人身份对上市公司感兴趣。虽然很难得出任何广泛的中风结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 56% of MGM China Holdings stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
上市公司目前拥有美高梅中国控股56%的股份。这可能是战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。可能是他们已经消失了。这一裁定可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that MGM China Holdings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious...
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,美高梅中国控股在我们的投资分析中显示出两个警告信号,其中一个可能很严重...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。