Is Chevron (NYSE:CVX) A Risky Investment?
Is Chevron (NYSE:CVX) A Risky Investment?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Chevron Corporation (NYSE:CVX) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
有人说,波动性,而不是债务,是投资者思考风险的最佳方式,但沃伦·巴菲特曾说过一句名言:“波动性远非风险的代名词。”当你检查公司的资产负债表的风险时,考虑它的资产负债表是很自然的,因为企业倒闭时通常会涉及债务。我们注意到,雪佛龙公司(纽约证券交易所代码:CVX)的资产负债表上确实有债务。但更重要的问题是:这笔债务会带来多大的风险?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时危险?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但如果企业无法还清贷方,那么债务就任其摆布。在最坏的情况下,如果公司无法向债权人付款,它可能会破产。但是,更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东,以支撑其资产负债表。当然,许多公司使用债务为增长提供资金,而不会产生任何负面后果。考虑公司债务水平的第一步是将其现金和债务放在一起考虑。
What Is Chevron's Net Debt?
雪佛龙的净负债是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Chevron had debt of US$23.2b, up from US$21.5b in one year. However, it does have US$4.01b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$19.2b.
您可以点击下图查看更多详情,该图片显示,截至2024年6月,雪佛龙的债务为232亿美元,高于一年的215亿美元。但是,它确实有40.1亿美元的现金抵消了这一点,净负债约为192亿美元。
How Healthy Is Chevron's Balance Sheet?
雪佛龙的资产负债表有多健康?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Chevron had liabilities of US$34.0b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$66.4b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$4.01b and US$20.7b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$75.7b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
放大最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到,雪佛龙在12个月内到期的负债为340亿美元,在此之后到期的负债为664亿美元。另一方面,它有40.1亿美元的现金和价值207亿美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和多出757亿美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Chevron has a huge market capitalization of US$276.9b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
尽管这可能看起来很多,但还不错,因为雪佛龙拥有2769亿美元的巨额市值,因此如果需要,它可能会通过筹集资金来加强资产负债表。但是,我们绝对希望留意其债务带来过大风险的迹象。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
为了扩大公司相对于收益的负债规模,我们计算其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),将其利息和税前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。这种方法的优势在于,我们既考虑了债务的绝对数量(包括净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润),也考虑了与该债务相关的实际利息支出(及其利息覆盖率)。
Chevron has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.47. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 53.2 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. It is just as well that Chevron's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 32% over the last year. When a company sees its earnings tank, it can sometimes find its relationships with its lenders turn sour. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Chevron's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
雪佛龙的净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润的比率很低,仅为0.47。而且其息税前利润很容易弥补其利息支出,是其规模的53.2倍。因此,我们对它超保守的债务使用相当放松。雪佛龙的负荷也不是太重,因为其息税前利润比去年下降了32%。当一家公司看到盈利下降时,它有时会发现与贷款机构的关系恶化。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但是,未来的收益将决定雪佛龙未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Chevron generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 82% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.
最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润根本无法减少债务。因此,我们显然需要研究该息税前利润是否会带来相应的自由现金流。在过去三年中,雪佛龙产生的自由现金流相当于其息税前利润的82%,超出了我们的预期。如果需要的话,这有利于偿还债务。
Our View
我们的观点
Chevron's EBIT growth rate was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. There's no doubt that its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT is pretty flash. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that Chevron is managing its debt quite well. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with Chevron , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
尽管我们考虑的其他因素要好得多,但雪佛龙的息税前利润增长率在这项分析中确实是负数。毫无疑问,它用息税前利润支付利息支出的能力非常闪烁。当我们考虑上述所有要素时,在我们看来,雪佛龙的债务管理得很好。但要谨慎一点:我们认为债务水平足够高,足以证明持续监测是合理的。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但归根结底,每家公司都可以控制资产负债表之外存在的风险。我们已经向雪佛龙确定了一个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
归根结底,通常最好将注意力集中在没有净负债的公司身上。您可以访问我们的此类公司的特别名单(所有公司都有利润增长记录)。它是免费的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。