share_log

Here's Why Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

这就是为何达登饭店(纽交所:DRI)能够负责任地管理债务
Simply Wall St ·  10/13 09:09

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE:DRI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

有人认为,作为投资者,最好的风险考量方法是波动性,而不是债务,但沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过,“波动性远非风险的同义词。”因此,明智的资金知道,债务是破产时通常涉及的一个非常重要的因素,当您评估一家公司的风险时。我们注意到,达登饭店(纽交所:DRI)的资产负债表上确实有债务。但股东们应该担心公司使用债务吗?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

债务带来了什么风险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

债务在企业遇到困难无法偿还时,可以通过新资本或自由现金流来帮助企业。资本主义的重要组成部分是“创造性破坏”过程,失败的企业无情地被其银行家清算。然而,一种更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是一家公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东,以便控制债务。当然,债务可以是企业中的重要工具,特别是在资本密集型企业中。在考虑企业使用多少债务时,首先要做的是查看其现金和债务。

What Is Darden Restaurants's Net Debt?

达登饭店的净债务是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at August 2024 Darden Restaurants had debt of US$1.72b, up from US$1.62b in one year. However, it also had US$192.5m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.52b.

下面的图像显示,2024年8月,达登饭店的债务为17.2亿美元,比一年前的16.2亿美元增加。不过,它也有1.925 亿美元的现金,因此净债务为15.2亿美元。

big
NYSE:DRI Debt to Equity History October 13th 2024
纽交所:DRI 2024年10月13日的资产负债比历史

How Strong Is Darden Restaurants' Balance Sheet?

Darden Restaurants的资产负债表有多坚实?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Darden Restaurants had liabilities of US$2.32b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$6.89b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$192.5m and US$57.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$8.96b.

最近的资产负债表显示,达登饭店一年内到期的负债为23.2亿美元,超过一年到期的负债为68.9亿美元。另一方面,其账上现金为1.925亿美元,一年内到期的应收账款为5770万美元。因此,其负债比现金和(短期)应收账款的总和高出89.6亿美元。

Darden Restaurants has a very large market capitalization of US$18.4b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

达登饭店的市值高达184亿美元,因此在需要时可能很有可能筹集现金以改善其资产负债表。但我们绝对要警惕迹象,表明其债务带来了过多的风险。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通过查看公司的净债务与利息、税、折旧、摊销前利润(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息费用(利息覆盖率)可以衡量一个公司的债务负担与收益能力。因此,我们考虑将债务与有无计算折旧和摊销费用的收益相对比。

Darden Restaurants has net debt of just 0.85 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And it boasts interest cover of 9.2 times, which is more than adequate. Also good is that Darden Restaurants grew its EBIT at 11% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Darden Restaurants can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

达登饭店的净债务仅为EBITDA的0.85倍,表明它绝对不是一个鲁莽的借款人。而且它的利息保障倍数为9.2倍,绰绰有余。此外,达登饭店过去一年EBIt增长11%,进一步增强了其管理债务的能力。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的重点。但最终业务未来的盈利能力将决定达登饭店能否随时间加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现分析师盈利预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Darden Restaurants produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 77% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最后,尽管税务人员可能喜欢会计利润,但贷款人只接受冷硬现金。因此,我们总是核实EBIt中有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去三年里,达登饭店产生的坚实自由现金流相当于其EBIt的77%,与我们的预期相当。这笔冷硬现金意味着它可以在需要时减少债务。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Darden Restaurants's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its level of total liabilities. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like Darden Restaurants is pretty sensible with its use of debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Darden Restaurants is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

愉快地,达登饭店将EBIt转化为自由现金流的印证表明它在债务方面占据上风。但更值得注意的是,我们对其总负债水平感到有些担忧。综合考虑以上各因素,达登饭店在债务使用方面似乎相当明智。虽然这会带来一些风险,但也能增加股东的回报。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是明显的起点。但最终,每家公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范围的风险。请注意,我们的投资分析显示达登饭店出现了3个警示信号,您应该了解...。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有这些之后,您更感兴趣的是具有坚实资产负债表的快速增长公司,那么不要拖延,查看我们的净现金增长股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发