GD Power Development Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600795) Stock Price Dropped 4.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
GD Power Development Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600795) Stock Price Dropped 4.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over GD Power DevelopmentLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- CHN ENERGY Investment Group Co.,Ltd owns 51% of the company
- 18% of GD Power DevelopmentLtd is held by Institutions
- 私人公司对国电电力公司的重大控制意味着普通公众有更多的影响管理和治理决策的权力。
- 中国能源投资集团有限公司拥有该公司51%的股份
- 国电电力公司的18%股份被机构持有。
A look at the shareholders of GD Power Development Co.,Ltd (SHSE:600795) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
通过查看国电电力发展股份有限公司(SHSE:600795)的股东,我们可以了解哪个集团最强大。拥有该公司股份最多的集团,准确地说约为52%,是私人公司。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.2%.
上周,随着股票下跌了4.2%,私营公司遭受了最大的损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of GD Power DevelopmentLtd.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注国电电力股份有限公司的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GD Power DevelopmentLtd?
机构持股给我们提供了什么关于国电电力公司的信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
GD Power DevelopmentLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see GD Power DevelopmentLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
国电电力股份有限公司已经在股东名册上拥有机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且喜欢它。但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错误的。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总有一种风险,即它们处于'拥挤的交易'状态。当这种交易出现问题时,多个股东可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以在下面看到国电电力股份有限公司的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更为复杂的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in GD Power DevelopmentLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is CHN ENERGY Investment Group Co.,Ltd with 51% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 5.0% and 1.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, China Securities Finance Corp, Asset Management Arm and Central Huijin Asset Management Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到,对于GD Power DevelopmentLtd,对冲基金并没有有意义的投资。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是中国能源投资集团有限公司,持有51%的股份。这意味着他们对公司未来具有绝对控制权。中国证券金融股份有限公司资产管理部分别持有5.0%和1.2%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of GD Power DevelopmentLtd
国电电力公司内部股权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我们注意到我们的数据不显示任何董事会成员持有股份。考虑到我们没有掌握内部持股情况,我们可能有缺失的数据。因此,有趣的是评估首席执行官的薪酬和任期。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GD Power DevelopmentLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众拥有30%的股权,主要由个别投资者组成,对国电电力有一定影响力。 虽然这个群体不能决定一切,但确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 52%, of the GD Power DevelopmentLtd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私人公司似乎拥有国电电力52%的股票。 私人公司可能是关联方。 有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而对公共公司产生兴趣,而不是以个人的身份。 虽然很难做出任何广义的结论,但值得进一步研究。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand GD Power DevelopmentLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - GD Power DevelopmentLtd has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.
值得考虑的是,不同的股东群体对公司股票的所有权。但是要更好地了解国电电力有限公司的情况,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例-国电电力有限公司有2个警示信号(其中1个令人担忧),我们认为您应该知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。