share_log

With 81% Ownership in The Sherwin-Williams Company (NYSE:SHW), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 81% Ownership in The Sherwin-Williams Company (NYSE:SHW), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

持有宣伟公司(纽交所:SHW)81%股权的机构投资者对业务押注很大
Simply Wall St ·  2024/10/15 19:59

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Sherwin-Williams' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 24 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考虑到机构在该股票中所持股份较大,宣伟公司的股价可能会受到其交易决策的影响
  • 前 24 大股东拥有该公司 50% 的股份。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company (NYSE:SHW) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下宣伟公司(纽交所:SHW)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。持有最大股份的是拥有81%所有权的机构。换句话说,该群体将从对该公司的投资中获得最大利润(或者承担最大风险)

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$4.1b in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 54%.

机构投资者的前景正在好转,该公司上周市值增加了410亿美元。上周的收益进一步提升了股东的一年回报率,目前达到了54%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sherwin-Williams, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨宣伟公司的每一种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:SHW Ownership Breakdown October 15th 2024
纽交所:宣伟公司2024年10月15日的股权拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sherwin-Williams?

机构持股对宣伟公司有何影响?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Sherwin-Williams does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sherwin-Williams' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,宣伟公司确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的相当大部分。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这一事实便依赖于此,因为机构有时会犯错误的投资,就像每个人都会一样。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总会存在他们在'拥挤交易'中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到宣伟公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更为复杂的。

big
NYSE:SHW Earnings and Revenue Growth October 15th 2024
纽交所:宣伟公司2024年10月15日的盈利和营业收入增长

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sherwin-Williams. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此他们可能强烈影响董事会决策。我们注意到对宣伟公司没有具有实质性投资的对冲基金。先锋集团目前是公司最大的股东,持有公司未来8.7%的股份。作为背景,第二大股东持有约7.4%的股份,第三大股东持有6.7%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 24 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在进行更多的挖掘后,我们发现前24个股东在该公司拥有50%的综合所有权,这意味着没有单一股东对公司具有重要控制力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Sherwin-Williams

宣伟公司的内部股权拥有情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that The Sherwin-Williams Company insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$280m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息显示,宣伟公司内部持有的股份不到公司总股本的1%。规模如此之大,我们不会期望内部持有大量的股票。他们共持有价值2.8亿美元的股票。看到董事会成员持有股份是件好事,但可能值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Sherwin-Williams. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大众,通常是个人投资者,持有宣伟公司12%的股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决定向他们有利,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Sherwin-Williams that you should be aware of before investing here.

我发现查看公司的股东信息非常有趣。但要获得真正的见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了一条涉及宣伟公司的警告信息,您在投资这里之前应当注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发