Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.'s (NYSE:HOV) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.'s (NYSE:HOV) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Hovnanian Enterprises implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 52% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构在霍夫纳尼安的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有着重大影响
- 业务的52%由前14位股东持有
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
Every investor in Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:HOV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
纽交所股票HOV的每位投资者都应意识到最有影响力的股东群体,拥有最大持股比例的是持有57%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团从对公司的投资中可能获得最多(或损失最多)
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$132m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 201% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周该公司市值增加了13200万美元,机构投资者的前景看好。投资回报率为201%,上一年的回报率已经达到了201%,这最近的增长是非常受欢迎的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hovnanian Enterprises, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解霍夫纳尼安企业各种所有者类型,首先从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hovnanian Enterprises?
机构持有权告诉我们关于霍夫纳尼安企业的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Hovnanian Enterprises does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hovnanian Enterprises' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到霍夫纳尼安企业确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股份的很大一部分。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总会存在一种“拥挤交易”的风险。如果这样的交易出现问题,多方可能会争相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以查看霍夫纳尼安企业的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事并不止于此。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hovnanian Enterprises is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Ara Hovnanian is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。霍夫纳尼安企业不是由对冲基金拥有的。该公司的首席执行官Ara Hovnanian是持有13%已发行股份的最大股东。为了背景信息,第二大股东持有大约6.4%的已发行股份,第三大股东持有5.4%的已发行股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔细看我们的所有权数据,前14名股东拥有的股份总和达到52%,暗示没有任何单一股东持有占多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
尽管研究一家公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增添价值,但研究分析师建议以深入了解股票的预期表现也是一个好的做法。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师的覆盖,因此可能为人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of Hovnanian Enterprises
霍夫纳尼安企业的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.3b, and insiders have US$254m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有霍夫纳尼安企业相当比例的股权。其市值仅为13亿美元,内部人士名下持有价值25400万美元的股份。这相当显著。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望查看这个免费图表,显示内部人员最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hovnanian Enterprises. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有21%股权的普通大众,主要由个人投资者组成,对霍夫纳尼安企业具有一定影响力。虽然这种股权规模可能不足以左右有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Hovnanian Enterprises (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。比如,投资风险这个永远存在的威胁。我们已经确定了霍夫纳尼安企业存在2个警告信号(至少有1个让我们感到有些不舒服),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。