Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Liberty Latin America Ltd. (NASDAQ:LILA) With 60% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Liberty Latin America Ltd. (NASDAQ:LILA) With 60% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Liberty Latin America implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 17 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 机构在Liberty Latin America的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价具有重要影响力
- 前17大股东持有该公司51%的股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在买入。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Liberty Latin America Ltd. (NASDAQ:LILA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 60% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制着Liberty Latin America Ltd. (NASDAQ:LILA)的情况,了解企业的所有权结构是很重要的。而持有最大股份的是拥有60%所有权的机构。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Last week's 6.1% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 43% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周的上涨达到了6.1%,这意味着机构投资者处于正面地位,即使公司显示出强劲的长期趋势。投资回报率为一年的43%,上周的收益应该受到了更多的欢迎。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Liberty Latin America, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解每种类型的自由拉丁美洲所有者,从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Liberty Latin America?
机构持有量对于自由拉丁美洲公司告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Liberty Latin America does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Liberty Latin America's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到自由拉丁美洲确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的大部分股票。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但是最好谨慎依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。当多家机构拥有一家股票时,存在“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样一笔交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以查看自由拉丁美洲的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更加复杂的。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Liberty Latin America. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 6.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.3% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Balan Nair, the CEO has 1.4% of the shares allocated to their name.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。我们注意到,对于Liberty Latin America,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。目前,BlackRock, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有6.7%的流通股。与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有6.3%和5.9%的流通股。另外,我们发现首席执行官Balan Nair拥有1.4%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
通过进一步的调查,我们发现前17名股东在公司中的持有总比例为51%,表明没有单一的股东对公司有重要控制力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Liberty Latin America
自由拉丁美洲的内部股权分布
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Liberty Latin America Ltd.. Insiders own US$207m worth of shares in the US$2.0b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我们最新的数据显示,内部持有合理比例的Liberty Latin America Ltd.股权。 内部持有价值20700万美元的股份,占据该20亿美元公司的相当比例。这是相当有意义的。 大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。 您可能希望查看这张最近交易内部人员的免费图表。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Liberty Latin America. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
持有21%股权的普通投资者,主要由个人投资者组成,对于Liberty Latin America具有一定的影响力。 尽管这种所有权比例可能不足以左右政策决定的赞同,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With a stake of 6.3%, private equity firms could influence the Liberty Latin America board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
拥有6.3%股份的股权投资公司可能会影响Liberty Latin America董事会。 一些投资者可能会受到鼓舞,因为股权投资有时能够鼓励市场看到公司的价值。另外,这些持有者可能在公司上市后退出投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。