Public Companies Are TravelSky Technology Limited's (HKG:696) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$2.9b
Public Companies Are TravelSky Technology Limited's (HKG:696) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$2.9b
Key Insights
主要见解
- TravelSky Technology's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 58% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- 14% of TravelSky Technology is held by Institutions
- 航信科技显著的上市公司持股表明,关键决策受到来自大型公众股东的影响。
- 前4个股东持有公司业务的58%。
- 机构持有14%的TravelSky Technology股份。
If you want to know who really controls TravelSky Technology Limited (HKG:696), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 31% to be precise, is public companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解谁真正控制着TravelSky Technology Limited (HKG:696),那么您就必须查看其股东登记册的构成。 公司中持有最多股份的集团, 约占公司的31%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大回报(或承担最大风险)
As market cap fell to HK$32b last week, public companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
随着市值上周跌至320亿港元,上市公司将面临比其他任何股东群体更高的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of TravelSky Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究航信科技的每种所有者类型,首先查看下面的图表。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241018/0-3874a4d9670663c0bbd6a5654c170814-0-ef0b1a495043b995af95167f7d494bfc.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TravelSky Technology?
机构股权告诉我们关于航信科技的情况
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
TravelSky Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TravelSky Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
TravelSky Technology已经有机构持有股份。实际上,他们在公司中拥有一个可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们可能会有错。如果多个机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得看一下TravelSky Technology以下的收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241018/0-3874a4d9670663c0bbd6a5654c170814-1-e52579d9aa6fcc5c6e196b23aaeaceda.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in TravelSky Technology. The company's largest shareholder is TransDigm Group Incorporated, with ownership of 30%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
我们注意到对于TravelSky Technology,对冲基金没有意义的投资。该公司最大的股东是TransDigm Group Incorporated,持有30%的股份。为了更好理解,第二大股东持有约10.0%的已发行股份,第三大股东持有9.5%的股份。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 58% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我们的研究也揭示了这样一个事实,即约58%的公司由前4大股东控制,这表明这些股东对公司的业务产生了很大的影响力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of TravelSky Technology
航信科技的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. We do not see this low level of ownership often, and it is possible our data is imperfect. But shareholders can click here to check if insiders have been selling stock.
我们的数据无法证实董事会成员是否持有个人股份。我们很少看到这种低水平的持股,我们的数据可能不完全正确。但是股东可以单击此处查看内部人是否出售了股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TravelSky Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有20%股权的普通大众,主要包括个人投资者,对TravelSky Technology有一定的影响力。虽然这一股权比例可能不足以影响政策决策偏好,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With a stake of 10.0%, private equity firms could influence the TravelSky Technology board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
拥有10.0%股权的股权投资公司可能会影响TravelSky Technology董事会。有时我们会看到股权投资持有股票很长一段时间,但一般来说,他们的投资期限较短,就像名字所暗示的那样,并不会在公共公司中进行太多投资。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售并在其他地方重新投资资金。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 25%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有该公司25%的股份。私人公司可能是关联方。有时内部人员通过在私人公司持有股份的方式对公共公司产生兴趣,而不是以个人的身份。尽管很难得出任何笼统的结论,但这是值得进一步研究的一个领域。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
It appears to us that public companies own 31% of TravelSky Technology. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我们看到公共公司拥有TravelSky Technology的31%股份。很难确定,但这表明它们有交织在一起的业务利益。这可能是战略股权,所以值得关注这一领域的所有权变化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand TravelSky Technology better, we need to consider many other factors.
始终值得考虑公司股票持有的不同群体。但要更好地了解TravelSky Technology,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。