share_log

With 62% Ownership in MGE Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGEE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 62% Ownership in MGE Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGEE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在MGE Energy, Inc.(纳斯达克: MGEE)拥有62%股权的机构投资者对该业务押注很大
Simply Wall St ·  10/18 06:56

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, MGE Energy's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 考虑到机构在股票中所占的大部分股份,道富银行(MGE Energy)的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响
  • 前14名股东持有该公司业务的50%。
  • 最近有内部人员购买。

If you want to know who really controls MGE Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGEE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道谁真正控制着道富银行(纳斯达克股票代码:MGEE),那么您需要看看其股东名册的构成。持有最大股份的是机构,占有62%。换句话说,该机构能够从对公司的投资中获得最大利润(或损失最大)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$3.4b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 33% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周,机构投资者在公司市值达到34亿美元后获益最多。股东的一年回报率目前为33%,而上周的收益则锦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MGE Energy.

让我们更近距离地看看不同类型的股东对MGE能源能告诉我们些什么。

big
NasdaqGS:MGEE Ownership Breakdown October 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:MGEE 所有权拆分2024年10月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MGE Energy?

机构所有权告诉我们有关MGE能源的信息是什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MGE Energy. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MGE Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在MGE能源中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的声誉。然而,最好谨慎依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会出错。当多家机构拥有一支股票时,总是存在一种“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下方看到MGE能源的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记得故事总是更加复杂。

big
NasdaqGS:MGEE Earnings and Revenue Growth October 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:MGEE收益与营业收入增长2024年10月18日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in MGE Energy. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.0% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会共同影响董事会的决定。对于MGE Energy,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。我们的数据显示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股东,持有16%的流通股份。第二大股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有普通股的13%,而State Street Global Advisors, Inc.持有公司股份的约4.0%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更仔细的研究表明,前14名股东拥有50%的股权,意味着没有单一股东持有绝对多数股权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加研究价值,但研究分析师建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一个好习惯。该股票的一些分析人士需要更多的关注时间。

Insider Ownership Of MGE Energy

MGE Energy内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of MGE Energy, Inc. in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$6.5m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据显示,内部人士在自己的名下拥有不到MGE Energy, Inc.1%的股份。请记住这是一家大公司,内部人士拥有价值650万美元的股份。绝对价值可能比比例份额更重要。至少看到一些内部人士拥有股份总是好事,但值得注意的是这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众--包括散户投资者--持有公司38%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。虽然这个群体不能必然掌握话语权,但它肯定会对公司的经营产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - MGE Energy has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我发现查看公司的实际持有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们也需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例 - mge energy有 2个警示标志 我们认为您应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发