share_log

Turtle Beach (NASDAQ:HEAR) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Turtle Beach (NASDAQ:HEAR) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

乌龟海岸(纳斯达克:HEAR)似乎相当明智地运用债务
Simply Wall St ·  10/18 07:46

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Turtle Beach Corporation (NASDAQ:HEAR) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

伯克希尔哈撒韦的查理·芒格支持的外部基金经理李录毫不掩饰地说:“最大的投资风险不在于价格的波动,而在于您是否会遭受资本永久损失。” 当我们考虑公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢看看它的债务使用情况,因为债务过载可能导致灭顶之灾。 与许多其他公司一样,乌龟海岸公司(纳斯达克:HEAR)利用债务。 但真正的问题是,这些债务是否使公司变得风险更大。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什么时候负债才是一个问题?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

一般来说,当公司无法轻松偿还债务时,即无法通过筹集资金或借用自有现金流偿还债务时,负债才会成为真正的问题。最终,如果公司无法履行其偿还债务的法律义务,股东将可能一无所获。然而,更常见(但仍然令人痛苦)的情况是,它不得不以低价发行新的权益资本,从而永久性地稀释股东。当然,很多公司使用债务为增长提供资金,没有任何负面后果。考虑一家企业使用了多少债务时,首先要做的是将其现金和债务一起考虑。

How Much Debt Does Turtle Beach Carry?

乌龟海岸承担多少债务?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 Turtle Beach had US$69.8m of debt, an increase on none, over one year. On the flip side, it has US$12.5m in cash leading to net debt of about US$57.3m.

您可以点击下方的图表查看历史数据,但显示,截至2024年6月,乌龟海岸负债6980万美元,与去年持平。反过来,它有1250万美元现金,导致净债务约5730万美元。

big
NasdaqGM:HEAR Debt to Equity History October 18th 2024
纳斯达克GM:HEAR债务/权益历史记录2024年10月18日

A Look At Turtle Beach's Liabilities

观察乌龟海岸的负债情况

According to the last reported balance sheet, Turtle Beach had liabilities of US$103.2m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$55.9m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$12.5m in cash and US$46.5m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$100.2m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根据最近披露的资产负债表,乌龟海岸有10320万美元的短期负债,以及5590万美元的长期负债。 抵消这一点,它有1250万美元的现金和4650万美元的应收账款,这些应收账款在12个月内到期。 因此,它的负债总计比其现金和短期应收账款合计多10020万美元。

Turtle Beach has a market capitalization of US$342.7m, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

乌龟海岸的市值为34270万美元,因此如果有需要,它很有可能筹集现金来改善其资产负债表。但我们一定要密切关注其债务带来的风险是否过大。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了比较一个公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆盖率)。因此,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量以及支付的利率。

Turtle Beach shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (6.0), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 0.88 times the interest expense. The debt burden here is substantial. However, the silver lining was that Turtle Beach achieved a positive EBIT of US$2.4m in the last twelve months, an improvement on the prior year's loss. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Turtle Beach's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

乌龟海岸股东面临净债务与EBITDA比率高(6.0)和利息覆盖率相对较弱的双重打击,因为EBIT仅为利息支出的0.88倍。 这里的债务负担相当大。然而,乌龟海岸在过去12个月实现了240万美元的正EBIT,相比前一年的亏损有所改善。 在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个起点。 但最终决定乌龟海岸能否保持健康资产负债表的是未来收入,这比任何事情都更重要。 如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现分析师利润预测的这份免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. Over the last year, Turtle Beach actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.

最后,业务需要有自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不能满足这一点。 因此,检查其息税前利润(EBIT)转化为实际自由现金流的比例至关重要。 在过去一年中,乌龟海岸实际产生的自由现金流比EBIT要多。 这种强劲的现金生成方式让我们如同看到穿着蜜蜂装的小狗一般感到欣慰。

Our View

我们的观点

Turtle Beach's interest cover was a real negative on this analysis, as was its net debt to EBITDA. But its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was significantly redeeming. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about Turtle Beach's use of debt. While debt does have its upside in higher potential returns, we think shareholders should definitely consider how debt levels might make the stock more risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Turtle Beach is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

乌龟海岸的利息偿付倍数在该分析中确实是一个负面因素,净债务与EBITDA之比也是如此。但其将EBIt转化为自由现金流的能力显著可取。当我们考虑以上提到的所有因素时,对乌龟海岸的债务使用我们确实感到有些谨慎。虽然债务的确存在潜在回报的好处,但我们认为股东们绝对应该考虑债务水平可能使股票更加风险。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显然的起点。但最终,每家公司都可能存在超越资产负债表之外的风险。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,乌龟海岸显示出1个警示信号,您应该知道...

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

归根结底,专注于没有净债务的公司往往更好。您可以访问我们的特别列表,其中包括所有表现出盈利增长轨迹的公司。这是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发