While Institutions Invested in Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA) Benefited From Last Week's 5.5% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most
While Institutions Invested in Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA) Benefited From Last Week's 5.5% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Cassava Sciences indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 36% of the company
- Insiders own 12% of Cassava Sciences
- 零售投资者在cassava sciences中拥有的相当大比例所有权表明,他们共同在管理和业务策略上有更大的发言权
- 前25大股东拥有公司36%的股份
- 内部人员拥有cassava sciences 12%的股份
Every investor in Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 60% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
cassava sciences, Inc. (纳斯达克: SAVA)的每位投资者都应意识到最强大的股东集团。零售投资者持有60%的股份,是公司中持有最多股份的群体。也就是说,如果股价上涨(或者出现下滑),这个群体将受益最多(或者损失最大)。
While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$72m market cap gain, institutions too had a 28% share in those profits.
尽管零售投资者是上周市场总市值增长7200万美元中受益最多的一群,但机构也在这些利润中占有28%的份额。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cassava Sciences, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究Cassava Sciences不同类型的股东,首先从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cassava Sciences?
机构持股告诉我们关于Cassava Sciences的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Cassava Sciences. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Cassava Sciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所见,机构投资者在Cassava Sciences中有相当数量的股份。 这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这支股票并且喜欢它。 但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。 如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,看一看Cassava Sciences的下面的营收历史是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cassava Sciences. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 6.7%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.6% and 5.4% of the stock. In addition, we found that Richard Barry, the CEO has 1.0% of the shares allocated to their name.
对于cassava sciences,对冲基金持有的股份不多。该公司最大的股东是BlackRock,拥有6.7%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约5.6%和5.4%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官Richard Barry名下拥有1.0%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好礼。该股票受到的分析师覆盖范围很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空间获得更多的覆盖范围。
Insider Ownership Of Cassava Sciences
cassava sciences的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Cassava Sciences, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$162m stake in this US$1.4b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
内部持有大量cassava sciences股票。看到内部人员在这14亿美元的公司中拥有有意义的16200万美元股份,实在很有趣。多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望查看最近内部人员交易的免费图表。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 60% of Cassava Sciences shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通投资者,主要由个人投资者组成,共同持有cassava sciences 60%的股份。这种所有权规模使得普通投资者拥有一些集体力量。他们可以并且可能会影响对执行薪酬、股利政策和拟议业务收购的决策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cassava Sciences better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 5 warning signs for Cassava Sciences (3 are a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
始终值得考虑在公司中持有股份的不同群体。但要更好地了解Cassava Sciences,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了Cassava Sciences的5个警示信号(其中3个有点令人担忧!)在您在此投资之前,您应该意识到这一点。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。