Fengzhushou (SZSE:301382) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Fengzhushou (SZSE:301382) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Fengzhushou Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301382) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
由巴菲特的合作伙伴查理·芒格支持的外部基金经理陆立铃在说到“最大的投资风险不是价格波动,而是你是否会遭受资本永久损失”时毫不掩饰。因此,聪明的资金知道,债务(通常与破产有关)是评估公司风险程度时的一个非常重要因素。我们可以看到,风铸数亿股份有限公司(SZSE:301382)在业务中使用债务。但这种债务是否会让股东担忧呢?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时有危险?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
债务在企业遇到偿还困难时可以提供帮助,要么通过新的资本,要么通过自由现金流。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法定义务,股东可能一无所有。然而,更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的价格发行股票,从而永久稀释股东的利益,以稳定其资产负债表。当然,债务的好处是它通常代表了廉价的资本,尤其是当它取代了公司能够以高回报率重新投资的稀释时。在考虑公司的债务水平时,第一步是考虑其现金和债务的总体情况。
What Is Fengzhushou's Debt?
风铸数亿的债务情况是什么?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Fengzhushou had debt of CN¥500.5m, up from CN¥370.7m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of CN¥472.4m, its net debt is less, at about CN¥28.1m.
下面的图片,您可以点击以获取更详细信息,显示截至2024年6月,风铸数亿的债务为50050万人民币,比一年前的37070万人民币增加。然而,由于它拥有47240万人民币的现金储备,其净债务较少,约为2810万人民币。
A Look At Fengzhushou's Liabilities
查看风驻守的负债情况
According to the last reported balance sheet, Fengzhushou had liabilities of CN¥558.3m due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥88.1m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥472.4m as well as receivables valued at CN¥705.3m due within 12 months. So it can boast CN¥531.3m more liquid assets than total liabilities.
根据最近披露的资产负债表,风驻守有因为12个月内到期的负债为人民币55830万,以及12个月后到期的负债为人民币8810万。 抵消这些义务,它拥有人民币47240万的现金,以及价值人民币70530万的应收款项,这些款项在12个月内到期。 因此,风驻守拥有人民币53130万更多的流动资产,比总负债多。
This short term liquidity is a sign that Fengzhushou could probably pay off its debt with ease, as its balance sheet is far from stretched. But either way, Fengzhushou has virtually no net debt, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!
这种短期流动性表明风驻守很可能能够轻松偿还债务,因为其资产负债表远非过于紧张。 但无论如何,风驻守几乎没有净债务,因此可以说它没有沉重的债务负担!
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
为了衡量公司相对于其收益的债务情况,我们计算其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆盖率)。这种方法的优点是,我们既考虑了债务的绝对量(净负债与 EBITDA),又考虑到了与该债务相关的实际利息支出(其利息覆盖率)。
Fengzhushou's net debt is only 0.16 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 160 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Fortunately, Fengzhushou grew its EBIT by 4.0% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is Fengzhushou's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
风驻守的净债务仅为其EBITDA的0.16倍。其EBIt覆盖其利息支出高达160倍。 因此,你可以说它受债务威胁并不比大象受到老鼠威胁更多。 幸运的是,风驻守在过去一年中将其EBIt增长了4.0%,使得债务负担看起来更易管理。 毫无疑问,我们大部分关于债务的信息都来自资产负债表。 但正是风驻守的盈利将影响资产负债表未来的表现。 因此,如果您希望了解更多关于其盈利的信息,不妨查看一下其长期盈利趋势图。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Fengzhushou saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最后,一个企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不足以偿还。 因此,我们始终检查有多少EBIt转化为自由现金流。 过去三年,风驻守的自由现金流总体呈现出大幅负增长。 尽管这可能是因为为了增长而进行的支出,但这确实使债务更加风险。
Our View
我们的观点
Based on what we've seen Fengzhushou is not finding it easy, given its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow, but the other factors we considered give us cause to be optimistic. There's no doubt that its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT is pretty flash. Considering this range of data points, we think Fengzhushou is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Fengzhushou that you should be aware of.
根据我们所看到的,凤竹兽在将EBIt转化为自由现金流方面并不容易,但我们考虑的其他因素让我们有理由乐观。毫无疑问,它用EBIt支付利息费用的能力相当强。考虑到这一系列数据点,我们认为凤竹兽在管理其债务水平方面处于一个良好的位置。但需要提醒的是:我们认为债务水平足够高,需要进行持续监测。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但最终,每家公司都可能存在超出资产负债表之外的风险。例如,我们发现凤竹兽存在2个警告信号,您应该注意。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
当然,如果您是那种喜欢购买没有债务负担的股票的投资者,那么不要犹豫,立即发现我们独家的净现金增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。