share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore NBT Bancorp Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NBTB) Recent US$67m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore NBT Bancorp Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NBTB) Recent US$67m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构投资者可能会忽略纳斯达克:NBT Bancorp Inc.(NASDAQ:NBTB)最近6,700万美元市值下降,因为长期利润保持稳健。
Simply Wall St ·  10/22 19:15

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in NBT Bancorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构在nbt bancorp的大量持股意味着它们对公司股价有重大影响
  • 共有17家投资者持有该公司的大部分股权,占51%的所有权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of NBT Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:NBTB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 63% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制着NBt Bancorp Inc.(纳斯达克:NBTB),重要的是了解企业的所有权结构。 机构持有63%的股份,是公司中拥有最多股份的。 换句话说,如果股价上涨(或者如果股价下跌),该集团将获益最多(或者损失最多)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.1% in value last week. However, the 45% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

没有股东喜欢在他们的投资上亏钱,尤其是机构投资者上周看到他们的持股价值下降了3.1%。然而,45%的一年回报可能已经有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但他们可能会对未来的损失感到担忧。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of NBT Bancorp.

在下图表中,我们来看一下NBt bancorp不同所有权群体。

big
NasdaqGS:NBTB Ownership Breakdown October 22nd 2024
纳斯达克:NBTb所有权拆分2024年10月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NBT Bancorp?

机构所有权告诉我们有关nbt bancorp的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

NBT Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at NBT Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

nbt bancorp已经在股东名册上拥有机构。事实上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。如果多家机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,股价可能会快速下跌。因此,值得查看以下nbt bancorp的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:NBTB Earnings and Revenue Growth October 22nd 2024
纳斯达克GS:nbt bancorp 2024年10月22日财报和营业收入增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in NBT Bancorp. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 4.9% of the stock.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要影响力。对于nbt bancorp,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。我们的数据显示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股东,持有14%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约12%和4.9%的股票。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东注册表上看,我们可以看到前17名股东控制了51%的股份所有权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of NBT Bancorp

nbt bancorp的内部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in NBT Bancorp Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$64m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股东们可能会对了解内部人士在nbt bancorp公司拥有股份感兴趣。 这是一家大公司,因此看到这种程度的一致性是件好事。 内部人士拥有价值6400万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 看到内部人士投资的这一水平是件好事。 您可以点击此处查看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NBT Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有34%所有权的普通大众,主要由个人投资者组成,在nbt bancorp拥有一定程度的影响力。 尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以左右一项政策决定偏袒他们,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with NBT Bancorp , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我发现了解公司股权结构非常有趣。 但要真正获得深入见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。 例如,投资风险这个永远存在的魅影。 我们已经确定了1个有关nbt bancorp的警示标志,并理解它们应该成为您投资过程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发