CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping Company Limited's (HKG:3877) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged HK$431m Last Week
CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping Company Limited's (HKG:3877) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged HK$431m Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The largest shareholder of the company is CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering (Group) Company Limited with a 75% stake
- Institutional ownership in CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping is 12%
- 中国船舶(香港)航运的大量上市公司股权表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响
- 该公司最大股东是中国船舶海洋工程(集团)公司,持股75%
- 中国船舶(香港)航运的机构持股比例为12%
Every investor in CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping Company Limited (HKG:3877) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is public companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
在中国船舶(香港)航运有限公司(HKG:3877)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。拥有该公司最多股份的群体,准确地说约为75%,是上市公司。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或者出现下行),该群体将获益最多(或者损失最多)。
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$11b market cap following a 4.3% gain in the stock.
作为结果,由于股价上涨4.3%,该公司市值达到了110亿港元,公共公司在上周取得了最高分。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping.
在下面的图表中,我们将聚焦于中远(香港)航运的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping?
机构所有权告诉我们关于CSSC(香港)航运的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在中远(香港)航运有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票,并且看好它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能会错误。当多家机构拥有一支股票时,总存在这样一种风险,即它们处于一种'拥挤的交易'中。当此类交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到中远(香港)航运的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事肯定有更多方面。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping. CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering (Group) Company Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 75% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.5% and 3.4% of the stock.
对CSSC(香港)航运的对冲基金持有的股份不多。中国船舶(香港)船舶有限公司目前是最大的股东,持有75%的股份。 这基本上意味着他们对公司未来有广泛的影响力,甚至可能直接控制。 相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.5%和3.4%的股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师情绪来了解风向也是有意义的。虽然有些股票受到分析师的关注,但该公司可能并未受到广泛关注。因此,它可能在路上获得更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping
CSSC(香港)航运的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我们无法证实董事会成员是否个人持有股份。董事会成员没有至少持有一些股份是不寻常的,所以我们的数据可能有误。下一步是查看这篇有关股票买入和卖出的免费总结,以进一步了解该问题。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众通常是个人投资者,在中船(香港)航运公司持有13%的股份。虽然这群人不能必然左右决策,但确实能对公司运营产生真正的影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 75% of the CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我们可以看到,上市公共公司持有中船(香港)航运公司75%的股份。虽然我们无法确定,但很可能这是一个战略性的股份。这些企业可能是相似的,或者彼此合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that CSSC (Hong Kong) Shipping is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious...
考虑不同拥有公司股份的群体总是值得的。 但要更好地了解中国船舶(香港)航运,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 请注意,中国船舶(香港)航运在我们的投资分析中显示了 2 个警告信号,其中一个可能很严重...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。