Farmers National Banc Corp.'s (NASDAQ:FMNB) 9.6% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 58% as Well as Institutions
Farmers National Banc Corp.'s (NASDAQ:FMNB) 9.6% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 58% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Farmers National Banc by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 33% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 零售投资者对农民国家银行的重要控制意味着普通大众在影响管理和治理决策方面拥有更多权力。
- 共有25名投资者持有该公司的多数股份,占有33%的所有权。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Farmers National Banc Corp. (NASDAQ:FMNB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制着农民国家银行公司(纳斯达克:FMNB),重要的是要了解业务的所有权结构。持有最大份额的是零售投资者,拥有58%的所有权。也就是说,如果股价上涨(或者如果股价下跌的话)该群体将获益最多(或者损失最大)。
While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 9.6% price drop, institutions with their 38% holdings also suffered.
零售投资者的持股在上周9.6%的价格下跌之后受到打击,持有38%股份的机构也遭受了损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Farmers National Banc, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究农民国家银行每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Farmers National Banc?
机构持股告诉我们关于农民国家银行的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Farmers National Banc already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Farmers National Banc's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
农民国家银行的股份登记簿上已经有了机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有一定比例的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。 如果多家机构同时改变对某股的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,看看农民国家银行下面的营收历史是值得的。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Farmers National Banc. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 7.8% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.8% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 2.8% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Kevin Helmick, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
对冲基金没有持有很多农民国家银行的股票。看到我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是BlackRock,Inc.拥有7.8%的流通股。第二大股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.拥有4.8%的普通股,Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有约2.8%的公司股票。此外,我们发现首席执行官Kevin Helmick拥有0.5%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of Farmers National Banc
农民国家银行的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Farmers National Banc Corp.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$24m worth of the US$532m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的最新数据显示,公司内部人员持有Farmers National Banc Corp.的一些股份。作为个人,内部人员共同持有价值2400万美元的53200万美元公司股份。有些人会说这显示股东和董事会的利益一致。但值得检查的是这些内部人员是否一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 58% stake in Farmers National Banc, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在Farmers National Banc持有相当大的58%股份,表明这是一只相当受欢迎的股票。有了这么多的股权,散户投资者可以共同发挥作用,影响股东回报,比如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使表决权,投票决定可能不会提升盈利能力的收购或兼并事项。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史记录,你也可以免费访问这个详细图表中的历史营收和收益图表。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。