Institutional Owners May Ignore ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CNOB) Recent US$58m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CNOB) Recent US$58m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies ConnectOne Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构持有的股份比例极高意味着康涅狄格联合银行的股价对它们的交易行为非常敏感
- 共有14名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,占有50%的所有权。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:CNOB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制着康涅狄格联合银行(NASDAQ:CNOB),重要的是了解企业的所有权结构。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司70%的股权。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上升空间(或下降风险)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$942m last week. However, the 62% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
公司市值上周下跌至94200万美元后,机构投资者是受影响最严重的群体。不过,股东们获得的62%的一年回报可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。然而,我们可以假设他们将警惕未来的风险。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ConnectOne Bancorp.
在下面的图表中,我们将聚焦于ConnectOne Bancorp的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ConnectOne Bancorp?
机构所有权对ConnectOne Bancorp告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
ConnectOne Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ConnectOne Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
ConnectOne Bancorp已经有机构在股东名册上。事实上,他们在公司拥有一定比例的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉度。然而,最好不要过分依赖机构投资者带来的所谓认可。他们也会犯错误。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总会存在它们进行‘人群工作’的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看ConnectOne Bancorp的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住故事并不仅限于此。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. ConnectOne Bancorp is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.0% and 5.9% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank Sorrentino is the owner of 2.0% of the company's shares.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们共同能够行使重大权力。ConnectOne Bancorp不是由对冲基金拥有。我们的数据显示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股东,持有公司11%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.0%和5.9%的股票。此外,CEO Frank Sorrentino拥有公司股份的2.0%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更仔细的研究表明,前14名股东拥有50%的股权,意味着没有单一股东持有绝对多数股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of ConnectOne Bancorp
ConnectOne Bancorp的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$63m worth of stock in the US$942m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告说,内部人员在ConnectOne Bancorp,Inc.拥有股份。在他们自己的名下,内部人员在这家市值94200万美元的公司中拥有6300万美元的股票。这至少显示出了一些对齐。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in ConnectOne Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有ConnectOne Bancorp的24%股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右某一项政策决定倾向他们方向,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ConnectOne Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors.
始终值得考虑公司股东中的不同群体。但要更好地了解ConnectOne Bancorp,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史记录,你也可以免费访问这个详细图表中的历史营收和收益图表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。