share_log

A Great Week That Adds to TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 45% Must Be Happy

A Great Week That Adds to TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 45% Must Be Happy

好未来集团(纽交所:TAL)的一年回报率增加,持有45%的机构投资者一定很高兴
Simply Wall St ·  2024/10/25 08:34

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in TAL Education Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 32% of TAL Education Group is held by insiders
  • 各机构在TAL Education Group的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有10名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • TAL教育集团32%的股份由内部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of TAL Education Group (NYSE:TAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看TAL教育集团(纽约证券交易所代码:TAL)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为45%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$273m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 8.2% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

在上周该公司的市值上涨了2.73亿美元之后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。目前,一年股东回报率为8.2%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TAL Education Group.

在下图中,我们放大了TAL教育集团的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:TAL Ownership Breakdown October 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:TAL 所有权明细 2024 年 10 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TAL Education Group?

关于TAL教育集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in TAL Education Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TAL Education Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所见,机构投资者在TAL教育集团拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看TAL教育集团的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:TAL Earnings and Revenue Growth October 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:TAL 收益和收入增长 2024 年 10 月 25 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in TAL Education Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Bangxin Zhang with 28% of shares outstanding. Yachao Liu is the second largest shareholder owning 4.2% of common stock, and Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking and Brokerage Investments holds about 3.5% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yachao Liu is also Chief Operating Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对TAL教育集团进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官张邦新,已发行股份的28%。刘亚超是第二大股东,拥有4.2%的普通股,摩根士丹利、投资银行和经纪投资持有公司约3.5%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股东刘亚超再次担任首席运营官,这表明公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前十名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of TAL Education Group

TAL 教育集团的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of TAL Education Group. Insiders own US$2.0b worth of shares in the US$6.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有TAL教育集团合理比例的股份。内部人士拥有这家价值62亿美元的公司价值20亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TAL Education Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

TAL教育集团拥有24%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对TAL教育集团有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for TAL Education Group that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了TAL教育集团的一个警告信号,在这里投资之前,你应该注意这个信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发