Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of First Community Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FCBC) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.7% Decrease
Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of First Community Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FCBC) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.7% Decrease
Key Insights
关键见解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in First Community Bankshares indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
- Insiders own 11% of First Community Bankshares
- 散户投资者对第一社区银行股的大量所有权表明,他们在管理和商业战略中集体拥有更大的发言权
- 前 25 名股东拥有公司 46% 的股份
- 内部人士拥有第一社区银行11%的股份
A look at the shareholders of First Community Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FCBC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看第一社区银行股份有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:FCBC)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,散户投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为48%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 6.7% price drop, institutions with their 35% holdings also suffered.
尽管在上周股价下跌6.7%之后,散户投资者的持股量受到打击,但持有35%的机构也遭受了损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of First Community Bankshares, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究第一社区银行股份的每种类型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Community Bankshares?
关于第一社区银行股票,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in First Community Bankshares. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at First Community Bankshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如你所见,机构投资者在第一社区银行股份中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看第一社区银行股份的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in First Community Bankshares. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.3% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.3% and 4.9% of the stock. In addition, we found that William Stafford, the CEO has 1.2% of the shares allocated to their name.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对第一社区银行股票进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大股东,已发行股份的8.3%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约5.3%和4.9%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官威廉·斯塔福德以其名义分配了1.2%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。
Insider Ownership Of First Community Bankshares
第一社区银行股份的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in First Community Bankshares, Inc.. Insiders have a US$87m stake in this US$772m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,内部人士持有第一社区银行股份公司的大量股份。业内人士在这项7.72亿美元的业务中持有8700万美元的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in First Community Bankshares. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有第一社区银行股份48%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - First Community Bankshares has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例——第一社区银行股份有1个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。