share_log

Institutional Investors in W. P. Carey Inc. (NYSE:WPC) See US$597m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in W. P. Carey Inc. (NYSE:WPC) See US$597m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

W. P. Carey Inc.(纽交所:WPC)的机构投资者上周市值减少了59700万美元,尽管长期收益使他们受益。
Simply Wall St ·  10/26 10:26

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies W. P. Carey's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 22 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 机构持股比例显著高表示W. P. Carey的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
  • 这家公司的前22大股东拥有其50%的股份。
  • 内部人士最近购买了股票。

Every investor in W. P. Carey Inc. (NYSE:WPC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 69% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

W. P. Carey Inc.(NYSE:WPC)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东集团。持有最大份额的是拥有69%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将获益最多(或者如果市场走低,损失最严重)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$13b last week. However, the 17% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

上周公司的市值下降至130亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最严重的群体。然而,17%的一年回报可能有助于减轻他们的整体损失。我们认为,他们可能会在未来留意薄弱环节。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of W. P. Carey.

在下面的图表中,我们放大查看W. P. Carey的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:WPC Ownership Breakdown October 26th 2024
纽交所:WPC 2024年10月26日的所有权情况

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About W. P. Carey?

机构投资者对W. P. Carey的所有权结构意味着什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

W. P. Carey already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of W. P. Carey, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

W. P. Carey已经有机构投资者在股东名册上。事实上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能犯错。如果有两家大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售某支股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此值得查看W. P. Carey的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也请记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:WPC Earnings and Revenue Growth October 26th 2024
纽约交易所:WPC盈利与营收增长2024年10月26日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in W. P. Carey. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对W. P. Carey来说,对冲基金持有的股份不多。目前,最大的股东是万得宏观集团,拥有14%的流通股。分别持有12%和5.5%的流通股,黑石集团和道富全球投资者是第二和第三大股东。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 22 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过更多的研究,我们发现前22家公司合共占有50%的股份,这表明没有单一的股东对公司有重大控制。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of W. P. Carey

W. P. Carey 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of W. P. Carey Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$82m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最新的数据显示,内部持有小于1%的 W. P. Carey Inc. 的股份。作为一家大公司,我们只希望内部持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值 8200万美元的股份。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但也值得注意的是,可能值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在买入股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的普通大众拥有该公司的31%股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这个群体不一定能左右决策,但确实可以对公司的经营产生实质性影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for W. P. Carey (2 are concerning) that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是很有价值的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了 W. P. Carey 的 4 个警示信号(其中 2 个令人担忧),您应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发