Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 4.2% Decrease
Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 4.2% Decrease
Key Insights
关键见解
- Jushri Technologies' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Institutions own 39% of Jushri Technologies
- Jushri Technologies拥有大量散户投资者的所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响
- 50% 的业务由前 15 名股东持有
- 机构拥有Jushri科技公司39%的股份
Every investor in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
Jushri科技公司的每位投资者(深圳证券交易所股票代码:300762)应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有该公司股份最多的集团是散户投资者,准确地说约为44%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。
Following a 4.2% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 39% stock also took a hit.
继上周股价下跌4.2%之后,散户投资者遭受的损失最大,但拥有39%股票的机构也受到打击。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Jushri Technologies.
在下图中,我们放大了Jushri Technologies的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jushri Technologies?
关于Jushri Technologies,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
Jushri Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jushri Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Jushri Technologies已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Jushri Technologies过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jushri Technologies. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shanghai Shuangyou Information Technology Co., Ltd. with 18% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder.
对冲基金在 Jushri Technologies 的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是上海双友信息技术有限公司,其已发行股份的18%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约8.6%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有4.2%的所有权。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前15名股东的合并所有权为50%,这意味着没有一个单一股东拥有多数股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of Jushri Technologies
Jushri科技的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我们的数据无法证实董事会成员亲自持有股份。鉴于我们没有获得内部所有权,我们可能缺少数据。因此,在这里评估首席执行官的薪酬和任期会很有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 44% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司44%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司的政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 18%, of the Jushri Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看来私营公司拥有Jushri Technologies18%的股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Jushri Technologies has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例——Jushri Technologies有1个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。