share_log

Capital Allocation Trends At CoreCivic (NYSE:CXW) Aren't Ideal

Capital Allocation Trends At CoreCivic (NYSE:CXW) Aren't Ideal

CoreCivic(纽交所:CXW)的资本配置趋势并不理想
Simply Wall St ·  10/29 06:45

What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? Typically, we'll see the trend of both return on capital employed (ROCE) declining and this usually coincides with a decreasing amount of capital employed. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. So after glancing at the trends within CoreCivic (NYSE:CXW), we weren't too hopeful.

什么潜在的基本趋势可能表明一家公司正在衰退?通常,我们会看到资本雇用回报率(ROCE)下降的趋势,这通常会与资本雇用量的减少相一致。这表明公司并未在复合股东财富,因为回报正在下降,其净资产基础正在缩小。因此,在查看CoreCivic (纽交所:CXW)的趋势后,我们并不乐观。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

资本雇用回报率(ROCE)是什么?

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on CoreCivic is:

如果您以前没有使用过ROCE,它衡量了公司在业务中利用的资本所产生的“回报”(税前利润)。CoreCivic 的这种计算公式如下:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。

0.074 = US$196m ÷ (US$2.9b - US$266m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.074 = 19600万美元 ÷(29亿美元 - 2.66亿美元)(基于截至2024年6月的最近十二个月)。

Thus, CoreCivic has an ROCE of 7.4%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Commercial Services industry average of 10%.

因此,CoreCivic 的ROCE为7.4%。最终,这是一个较低的回报率,低于商业服务行业的平均水平10%。

big
NYSE:CXW Return on Capital Employed October 29th 2024
纽交所:CXW 资本雇用回报率2024年10月29日

Above you can see how the current ROCE for CoreCivic compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for CoreCivic .

您可以看到CoreCivic目前的ROCE与其以前的资本回报率相比如何,但过去只能告诉你这么多。 如果您感兴趣,您可以查看我们为CoreCivic免费提供的分析师预测报告。

What Can We Tell From CoreCivic's ROCE Trend?

我们可以从CoreCivic的ROCE趋势中得出什么结论?

We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at CoreCivic. About five years ago, returns on capital were 9.4%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect CoreCivic to turn into a multi-bagger.

我们对CoreCivic资本回报率的趋势有些担忧。大约五年前,资本回报率为9.4%,然而,如上所示,现在要低得多。在资本运用方面,该业务正在利用大致相同数量的资本,与五年前持平。由于回报率正在下降,而企业使用的资产数量相同,这可能表明它是一个在过去五年中没有太多增长的成熟企业。如果这些趋势持续下去,我们不会指望CoreCivic成为一个翻倍增长的股票。

The Key Takeaway

重要提示

In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. And, the stock has remained flat over the last five years, so investors don't seem too impressed either. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.

最终,资本回报率下降趋势并未通常表明我们正在研究一只增长股票。此外,过去五年股票价格保持不变,因此投资者似乎也并不太满意。除非这些指标出现更积极的转变,否则我们会寻找其他地方。

CoreCivic does come with some risks though, we found 5 warning signs in our investment analysis, and 2 of those can't be ignored...

CoreCivic确实存在一些风险,我们在投资分析中发现了5个警告信号,其中2个是不容忽视的...

While CoreCivic isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

虽然CoreCivic的回报率并不是最高的,请查看这份公司的免费名单,这些公司在净资产收益率和健全资产负债表方面获得了高回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发