With 82% Ownership in Brookline Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:BRKL), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 82% Ownership in Brookline Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:BRKL), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Brookline Bancorp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 8 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 鉴于机构在股票中持有较大股份,布鲁克赖恩银行的股价可能容易受到他们的交易决定的影响
- 前8大股东占有公司的52%股份。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Brookline Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:BRKL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制着布鲁克赖恩银行(纳斯达克股票代码:BRKL),重要的是要了解该业务的所有权结构。 机构拥有82%的股份,在公司中拥有最多的股份。 换句话说,该集团在投资公司方面有最大的获利空间(或损失空间)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$966m in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 45% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上周,机构投资者以公司市值达到96600万美元为最大赢家。股东的一年回报率目前为45%,而上周的增长更是锦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Brookline Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解布鲁克赖恩银行每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brookline Bancorp?
机构所有权告诉我们有关布鲁克赖恩银行的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Brookline Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Brookline Bancorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到布鲁克赖恩银行确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这可能表明公司在投资社区中有一定程度的信誉。然而,最好谨慎依赖所谓的机构投资者带来的验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果有两位大型机构投资者同一时间尝试抛售某支股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查布鲁克赖恩银行的过去盈利轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Brookline Bancorp. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 5.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Paul Perrault, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要权力。对布鲁克赖恩银行而言,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。目前,BlackRock, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有14%的流通股份。其次是The Vanguard Group, Inc.和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP,分别持有11%和5.8%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。此外,我们发现CEO Paul Perrault拥有公司0.7%的股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
内部人员拥有佛山蓝火箭电子股份有限公司的重要比例。内部人员在这家69亿元人民币的企业中持有25亿元人民币的股份,看到内部人员如此投资是很好的。如果这些内部人员最近一直在购买,那就值得检查。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Brookline Bancorp
布鲁克赖恩银行的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Brookline Bancorp, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$31m worth of the US$966m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以看到,内部持有布鲁克赖恩银行的股票。作为个人,内部持有人共同拥有总值为3,100万美元的这家总值为9,6600万美元的公司。这至少表明了一些一致性。您可以单击此处查看这些内部持有人是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Brookline Bancorp. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在布鲁克赖恩银行拥有14%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不一致,可能没有足够的力量改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Brookline Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors.
考虑到持有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解布鲁克赖恩银行,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史记录,你也可以免费访问这个详细图表中的历史营收和收益图表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。