Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) Gained 7.8%, Institutions Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) Gained 7.8%, Institutions Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Coastal Financial by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 个人投资者对Coastal Financial拥有重大控制权,意味着普通公众有更多权力影响管理和治理相关决策
- 前25名股东拥有该公司的45%股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看下Coastal Financial Corporation (纳斯达克:建设银行) 的股东,可以告诉我们哪一组最具影响力。 公司持有股份最多的是个人投资者,占公司股份约54%,换句话说,该组面临着最大的上升潜力(或下行风险)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$787m last week, while institutions who own 28% also benefitted.
上周市值触及78700万美元后,个人投资者获利最多,同时拥有28%的机构也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Coastal Financial, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解Coastal Financial每种所有者类型,首先从下面的图表开始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Coastal Financial?
机构所有权告诉我们关于coastal financial的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Coastal Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Coastal Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到coastal financial确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的股份。 这意味着那些机构的分析师已经看过这支股票,而且他们喜欢它。 但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。 如果多个机构同时改变他们对一支股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的coastal financial的收入历史记录。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Coastal Financial. Steven Hovde is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 4.6% of the stock. In addition, we found that Eric Sprink, the CEO has 1.0% of the shares allocated to their name.
我们注意到对海岸金融的投资基金并不重要。Steven Hovde目前是公司最大的股东,持有13%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.3%和4.6%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官Eric Sprink名下持有1.0%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Coastal Financial
海岸金融的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Coastal Financial Corporation. Insiders have a US$145m stake in this US$787m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有人持有海岸金融公司合理比例的股份。内部持有人在这家总市值为78700万美元的企业中持有14500万美元的股份。看到内部持有人如此投入业务是件好事。也许值得看看这些内部持有人最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 54% of Coastal Financial shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
普通大众,主要由个人投资者组成,共同持有海岸金融股份的54%。凭借这种所有权,零售投资者可以共同在影响股东回报的决策中发挥作用,比如股利政策和董事的任命。他们也可以行使权力投票表决那些可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Coastal Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Coastal Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考虑到持有公司股票的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解coastal financial,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。比如,要考虑到投资风险这个常见的阴影。我们已经发现了1个关于coastal financial的警示信号,了解这些应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。