Capital Allocation Trends At Healthcare Services Group (NASDAQ:HCSG) Aren't Ideal
Capital Allocation Trends At Healthcare Services Group (NASDAQ:HCSG) Aren't Ideal
When we're researching a company, it's sometimes hard to find the warning signs, but there are some financial metrics that can help spot trouble early. More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. On that note, looking into Healthcare Services Group (NASDAQ:HCSG), we weren't too upbeat about how things were going.
在研究一家公司时,有时很难找到警告信号,但有一些财务指标可以帮助及早发现问题。往往我们会看到资本雇用回报率(ROCE)下降和资本雇用量下降。这表明公司没有扩大股东财富,因为回报在下降,其净资产基础在减少。在这一点上,查看Healthcare Services Group(纳斯达克:HCSG),我们对事情的发展并不乐观。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本雇用回报率(ROCE)是什么?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Healthcare Services Group is:
对于那些不确定ROCE是什么的人,它衡量了公司从其业务中使用的资本所能产生的税前利润量。在Healthcare Services Group上进行此计算的公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。
0.098 = US$60m ÷ (US$806m - US$197m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.098 = 6000万美元 ÷ (80600万美元 - 1.97亿美元)(基于2024年9月至2024年12个月的数据)。
So, Healthcare Services Group has an ROCE of 9.8%. Even though it's in line with the industry average of 10%, it's still a low return by itself.
因此,Healthcare Services Group的ROCE为9.8%。即使与行业平均水平10%相符合,但它仍然是一个低回报。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Healthcare Services Group compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Healthcare Services Group .
在上面,您可以看到医疗服务集团目前的资本回报率与其历史资本回报率相比,但过去的数据仅能提供有限信息。如果您感兴趣,您可以查看我们为医疗服务集团提供的免费分析师报告中的分析师预测。
How Are Returns Trending?
综合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其资本利用率所产生的回报。考虑到股票过去五年保持稳定,如果其他指标也不错,则可能存在机会。因此,进一步研究这家公司并确定这些趋势是否会持续是合理的。
We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at Healthcare Services Group. To be more specific, the ROCE was 16% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Healthcare Services Group becoming one if things continue as they have.
我们对医疗服务集团资本回报率的趋势有些担忧。具体来说,五年前的资本回报率为16%,但自那时以来显著下降。值得注意的是,业务中使用的资本金额保持相对稳定。由于回报率在下降且企业使用的资产量相同,这可能表明这是一个成熟的企业,在过去五年中没有太多增长。因此,由于这些趋势通常无法促成倍增,如果事态继续发展如此,我们不会对医疗服务集团能够成为倍增者抱太大希望。
The Bottom Line
还有一件事需要注意的是,我们已经确定了上海医药的2个警告信号,了解这些信号应该成为你的投资过程的一部分。
All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. Investors haven't taken kindly to these developments, since the stock has declined 51% from where it was five years ago. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.
总体而言,同等资本投入带来较低回报并不是复合机器的迹象。投资者对这些情况并不买账,因为股价与五年前相比下跌了51%。除非这些指标有积极的转变趋势,否则我们会寻找别的投资机会。
If you're still interested in Healthcare Services Group it's worth checking out our FREE intrinsic value approximation for HCSG to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.
如果您仍对医疗服务集团感兴趣,值得查看我们为HCSG提供的免费内在价值估算,以查看其在其他方面是否以有吸引力的价格交易。
While Healthcare Services Group isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
虽然医疗服务集团没有获得最高回报,请查看这份免费的公司列表,这些公司在权益方面获得了高回报并拥有实力的资产负债表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。